Our mighty men of War and Valor: An essay. What if we had a politician that said everyone will know his pain before he is done. What if such a politician also said that he turn politics quietly and gently into his personal kingdom and ensure his descendants would inherit his authority? What if he decided to continue his influence through use of public funds to buy supermarkets in some other part of the world? What if no one had any time to worry about much of this because at least they have their income support money at levels that rival and compete with the best funded populations in the world that have the teams of the best dressed, best equipped citizens for all that daily modern life affords us like that 12 hour journey to some other side of the world just for your education and experience; and you are not likely to be making the trip in search of financial help as an asylum seeker unless there is a case of violence. In the Consumer Olympics with the contest at the Frankfurt Airport or Tokyo Airport duty free, the North Americans are the financially under equipped. They are welcome to seek asylum. The airport customs officers can see how much money you have in your personal assets and how is your team of citizens doing; comparatively? Are all citizens covered and why not all citizens if in fact it is not that all citizens are covered? If all citizens are not covered with an income support, then it is like visiting war on your own population when money is so evidently obvious as a necessity to maintain life. If the population does not have the money, then they do not have what is necessary for life but that would mean they are dying and face imminent death. With all that a government could do very simply and easily to defend its population and we mean defend it with monetary provision, why would it not happen? We need to see that every citizen is potentially part of your fighting force and one of your mighty men of valor or maybe a school teacher or bus driver for one of these individuals as they grow up. It's good when we can all thank God that our basic needs have been met by our government, that government as an expression of each and everyone of us and our community, as we get on with other goals in life; like that family photo with three generations. So, when there are too many pot holes on the roads or not enough money, the government works to respond to our needs and our concerns as we provide that government feedback. We can get angry and ask if there is anyone higher up that we can blame; a special potentate who we will make supremely responsible for our plight and that potentate will say you already have a government formed by the people, legally or illegally, that could give you the money you seek and if it does not, how do you make the potentate responsible for what you and you have failed to do yourself? But, because you have failed with your government maybe since now someone in there has said he seeks to mock the potentate in the potentate's unmovable, inherited position that will remain even if the people are in need of resources, your mockery only makes him more legitimate since you could be asked to leave and you would have to leave since you have a job description (not an inherited position although you can pretend); a job contract and job duties of some kind but not an ongoing birthday party; and certainly not a throne. While you ignore the little things in your mockery, you confirm just who and what you are; a master of mockery as you tell the world that you think some potentate owes you for your ancestor's plight but you are not really interested in helping people but you maybe in the lack of responsiveness, you are magnifying a suffering and you seem to resent on anyone who could remind you that it might not be that difficult to achieve the essential goals and concerns. Could we afford two or three generations of mockery? It seems there are just too many people who do not have their income support money. Does the mockery have to be evident and painful? How would a bank payments department manager be assessed on performance when assessed once a month? Maybe all the payments, as requested get to their destination on time. Maybe only 40% of them get to their destination. Maybe 40% of the population is not getting their money but if they did, they would go to find their ancestral fishing grounds just as new people arriving from Eastern Europe have come to one Great lake or the other; to see and enjoy their ancestral aboriginal fishing grounds. 40% of the population, though, is a very high number and so then what do we do and what can we do except but ask for help when you see the money is not arriving and it should arrive in equal amounts, or just about equal amounts, as an income supplement for every citizen. Just about equal works out to around $80000.00 per year. We fix this as might men of valor and keep bringing as many foreigners as possible since its nice; all the different and spicy foods. No one is asking you to leave. Stay until the job is done. Would it make sense that we have more aboriginal acknowledgement of the various local nations but less government responsiveness manifesting at the same time s this new, increased aboriginal acknowledgment and maybe this is where we say with acknowledgement that the government pays us the money we need and expeditiously? There is nothing wrong with being in a job and taking photos with people. It looks good with that type of wool and the front page is just great but what if the water stopped running or the money stopped or something else? The photos of that kid who could pass for everybody's grandson would not be enough as he tap dances on the issue as him a' defiantly ignores de problem as if to say "...isn't this what the Roi/or Reine did?" How does it help if someone is paid with our taxes to do this to us; but he is on the front page of our news? The evidence of some tragedies are becoming too evident. But, those tragedies are human beings who may have been attacked by people arriving in America or Canada and hoping to prey on people and some of these tragedies; they might be former soldiers. They might be relatives of soldiers or police officers; many police officers. There is one more thing; what is it when " 1000 of us that if we have too much, we are afraid that the Americans or the Europeans will not help us if we needed help if we went to America or Europe...and what help would you want and why would you say would conspire to keep the population on the edge of death, hoping to get help if you needed help and you need help because there is not enough money in the population but if you did have money, would you need help?
Our mighty men of War and Valor: An essay. What if we had a politician that said everyone will know his pain before he is done. What if such a politician also said that he turn politics quietly and gently into his personal kingdom and ensure his descendants would inherit his authority? What if he decided to continue his influence through use of public funds to buy supermarkets in some other part of the world? What if no one had any time to worry about much of this because at least they have their income support money at levels that rival and compete with the best funded populations in the world that have the teams of the best dressed, best equipped citizens for all that daily modern life affords us like that 12 hour journey to some other side of the world just for your education and experience; and you are not likely to be making the trip in search of financial help as an asylum seeker unless there is a case of violence. In the Consumer Olympics with the contest at the Frankfurt Airport or Tokyo Airport duty free, the North Americans are the financially under equipped. They are welcome to seek asylum. The airport customs officers can see how much money you have in your personal assets and how is your team of citizens doing; comparatively? Are all citizens covered and why not all citizens if in fact it is not that all citizens are covered? If all citizens are not covered with an income support, then it is like visiting war on your own population when money is so evidently obvious as a necessity to maintain life. If the population does not have the money, then they do not have what is necessary for life but that would mean they are dying and face imminent death. With all that a government could do very simply and easily to defend its population and we mean defend it with monetary provision, why would it not happen? We need to see that every citizen is potentially part of your fighting force and one of your mighty men of valor or maybe a school teacher or bus driver for one of these individuals as they grow up. It's good when we can all thank God that our basic needs have been met by our government, that government as an expression of each and everyone of us and our community, as we get on with other goals in life; like that family photo with three generations. So, when there are too many pot holes on the roads or not enough money, the government works to respond to our needs and our concerns as we provide that government feedback. We can get angry and ask if there is anyone higher up that we can blame; a special potentate who we will make supremely responsible for our plight and that potentate will say you already have a government formed by the people, legally or illegally, that could give you the money you seek and if it does not, how do you make the potentate responsible for what you and you have failed to do yourself? But, because you have failed with your government maybe since now someone in there has said he seeks to mock the potentate in the potentate's unmovable, inherited position that will remain even if the people are in need of resources, your mockery only makes him more legitimate since you could be asked to leave and you would have to leave since you have a job description (not an inherited position although you can pretend); a job contract and job duties of some kind but not an ongoing birthday party; and certainly not a throne. While you ignore the little things in your mockery, you confirm just who and what you are; a master of mockery as you tell the world that you think some potentate owes you for your ancestor's plight but you are not really interested in helping people but you maybe in the lack of responsiveness, you are magnifying a suffering and you seem to resent on anyone who could remind you that it might not be that difficult to achieve the essential goals and concerns. Could we afford two or three generations of mockery? It seems there are just too many people who do not have their income support money. Does the mockery have to be evident and painful? How would a bank payments department manager be assessed on performance when assessed once a month? Maybe all the payments, as requested get to their destination on time. Maybe only 40% of them get to their destination. Maybe 40% of the population is not getting their money but if they did, they would go to find their ancestral fishing grounds just as new people arriving from Eastern Europe have come to one Great lake or the other; to see and enjoy their ancestral aboriginal fishing grounds. 40% of the population, though, is a very high number and so then what do we do and what can we do except but ask for help when you see the money is not arriving and it should arrive in equal amounts, or just about equal amounts, as an income supplement for every citizen. Just about equal works out to around $80000.00 per year. We fix this as might men of valor and keep bringing as many foreigners as possible since its nice; all the different and spicy foods. No one is asking you to leave. Stay until the job is done. Would it make sense that we have more aboriginal acknowledgement of the various local nations but less government responsiveness manifesting at the same time s this new, increased aboriginal acknowledgment and maybe this is where we say with acknowledgement that the government pays us the money we need and expeditiously? There is nothing wrong with being in a job and taking photos with people. It looks good with that type of wool and the front page is just great but what if the water stopped running or the money stopped or something else? The photos of that kid who could pass for everybody's grandson would not be enough as he tap dances on the issue as him a' defiantly ignores de problem as if to say "...isn't this what the Roi/or Reine did?" How does it help if someone is paid with our taxes to do this to us; but he is on the front page of our news? The evidence of some tragedies are becoming too evident. But, those tragedies are human beings who may have been attacked by people arriving in America or Canada and hoping to prey on people and some of these tragedies; they might be former soldiers. They might be relatives of soldiers or police officers; many police officers. There is one more thing; what is it when " 1000 of us that if we have too much, we are afraid that the Americans or the Europeans will not help us if we needed help if we went to America or Europe...and what help would you want and why would you say would conspire to keep the population on the edge of death, hoping to get help if you needed help and you need help because there is not enough money in the population but if you did have money, would you need help?