A Black high school graduate from South Africa or the West Indies in North England does not emblemize a formal challenge to legal informalities where some might say they would like to turn his life into a game of abuses by some individuals who may not take it lightly that such a person could have decided to respect his white mother or father and attend school to graduate. Maybe his mother was mixed race Maltese. In some apartheid residue resounding in the UK contrary to law, they have threatened the life of the citizen by interrupting his university government student loan. He became kind of a Martyr; an Apartheid martyr but in England of Apartheid residue and he did not need this attention. We don't need any A- level students to be spectacles or unnecessary martyrs of these nefarious bank employees . They held the payment in sundry and hoped that the school administrator would be like them and follow along and then show up at the bank to get one of the payments of what is not yet paid into the client account. The students had to leave school and when they looked into it, the administrator confirmed the loan payment and it kept coming to the bank's general account used by the bank to receive customer wire transfers with the student's account number for credit to his account but the lady suffering with apartheid residue working at the bank that was angry about his submissiveness to his family and his Catholic and Anglican Priest about the virtue of education held the payment in the general account while she should have credited it to the student's account. He attended the bank and asked. Warren already did. They said they see nothing in the account. They kept saying it and the reason why they say they saw nothing in the account is clearly and simply because the money has not been credited to the customer account yet but it was on hold in the Bank's general account and the government with their correspondent bank confirms that the money was paid to the bank on such a date for credit the customer account and therefore the bank holding the funds will be charged use of funds at the Bank of England rate per day for the number of days that the funds were not applied to the beneficiary account. They have also been charged for fraud along with their employees since it went on for years with this repetitious catch phrase that they see nothing in the account as they kill dreams and take human lives when that money was sent as intended for the good purposes. Money was then paid out over and over again to several co accused who picked up the cash equivalent on a two for one basis with the monies taken from the general float with no other source to take it from and that general float was made available from the Bank of England in the branch. It will be machines now only in this particular branch location or at any branch where employees continued in this criminal activity for 3 months or more and the client with card that can access cash from the machines in the branch or on the high street or street corner 24 hours per day. Would this have happened if this type of person with this proclivity was not hired at the bank? An airline job might be best. If it was not for this type of employee with this proclivity, it would not have happened. Someone almost died. The boy did not deserve to be a martyr only because of his A level or three University degrees and nor did he need the attention given to one. He had barely raised a dog and bred pups. They did not see what they confessed in their disrespect for the bank's money and the bank's relationship with the government. After handing this cash out on a 2 for 1 basis (2 bags of cash to the co accused for every transfer held in the cue) the bank was in debt to the Bank of England and then taken over by the Bank of England. All the bank had to do is select "Release Funds." After this problem was discovered, it had to be done at HSBC for fund held since November 2001 and also for funds held at HALIFAX PLC since November 2021. The funds are all in the bank's general receiving account and routed to the bank with notice for credit to the customer's account awaiting the branch employee to select "Release Funds." This has not happened so while there is payment waiting to be released, it has not been released and therefore it has not been received by the customer. The payments were only &1300.00 each approximately. The Bank nor the Monarch does not covet payments made pursuant to his laws. Why would the monarch or any of their good associates be accused of wanting a citizen's benefit? The Bank of England ensured compliance with new regulations in addition to the take over with the function of crediting payments directly to the customer account turned into a robotic automated function for all payments under $40,000.00. Some in the bank interrupted the system and would not select "Release Funds" in some interruption of formality until they were sure the recipient was a church member and he is and others would not release funds until they were sure he donated to some church and he did. Others did not release funds until they were sure he had sat in the branch for at least 40 minutes and he did. He is not the bank teller's father; certainly not. Then one person said that because he is a formal graduate with A Levels, that they would like to give him the money in his coffin as some expression of her hatred of those with formal education. The tellers had jobs and they also received this income supplement benefit while they continued in this course of thievery in the bank of the bank's money and the government's money as motivated by greed; greed of the co-accused also that shows up to receive the cash as many of them were recieving the benefit also. Some wanted to think that some retired pub king was hoping to show his pub lady wife how he could kill this A- level college graduate and steal the food service ideas that he presented in his business school class; something about Frost Byte Pastries(TM) or London Pub Pizza Co (TM). The Pub King could buy this concept for $9000.00. She was not thinking anything like it and told him to just fix the little problem so the boy could have his little money or otherwise, she would thinking of him the way he behaves. The Retired Pub King could see if he can take this company out of its dormancy and make something of it. ClIck here.

A Black high school graduate from South Africa or the West Indies in North England does not emblemize a formal challenge to legal informalities where some might say they would like to turn his life into a game of abuses by some individuals who may not take it lightly that such a person could have decided to respect his white mother or father and attend school to graduate. Maybe his mother was mixed race Maltese.    In some apartheid residue resounding in the UK contrary  to law, they have threatened the life of the citizen by interrupting his university government student loan. He became  kind of a Martyr; an Apartheid martyr but in England of Apartheid residue and he did not need this attention.  We don't need any A- level students to be spectacles or unnecessary martyrs of these nefarious bank employees .   

They held  the payment in sundry and hoped that the school administrator would be like them and follow along and then show up at the bank to get one of the payments of what is not yet paid into the client account.  The students had to leave school and when they looked into it, the administrator confirmed the loan payment and it kept coming to the bank's general account used by the bank to  receive customer wire transfers with the student's account number for credit to his account but the lady suffering  with apartheid residue working at the bank that was angry about his submissiveness to his family and his Catholic and Anglican Priest about the virtue of education  held the payment in the general account while she should have credited it to the student's account.  He attended the bank and asked.  Warren already did.   They said they see nothing in the account. They kept saying it and the reason why they say they saw nothing in the account is clearly and simply because the money has not been credited to the customer account yet but  it was on hold in the Bank's general account and the government with  their correspondent bank confirms that the money was paid to the bank on such a date for credit the customer account and therefore the bank holding the funds will be charged use of funds at the Bank of England rate per day for the number of days that the funds were not applied to the beneficiary account. They have also been charged for fraud along with their employees since it went on for years with this repetitious catch phrase that they see nothing in the account as they kill dreams and take human lives when that money was sent as intended for the good purposes. Money was then paid out over and over again to several co accused who picked up the cash equivalent on a two for one basis with the monies taken from the general float with no other source to take it from and that general float was made available from the Bank of England in the branch. It will be machines now only in this particular branch location or at any branch where employees continued in this criminal activity  for 3 months or more and the client with card that can access cash from the machines in the branch or on the high street or street corner 24 hours per day. Would this have happened if this type of person with this proclivity was not hired at the bank?  An airline job might be best.    If it was not for this type of employee with this proclivity, it would not have happened.  Someone almost died. The boy did not deserve  to be a martyr only because of his A level or three University degrees  and nor did he need the attention given to one.  He had barely raised a dog and bred pups.  They did not  see what they confessed in their disrespect for the bank's money and the bank's relationship with the government.  

After handing this cash out on a 2 for 1 basis (2 bags of cash to the co accused for every transfer held in the cue) the bank was in debt to the Bank of England and then taken over  by the Bank of England.  All the bank had to do is select "Release Funds." After this problem was discovered, it had to be done at HSBC for fund held since November 2001 and also for funds held at HALIFAX PLC since November 2021.  The funds are all in the bank's general receiving account and routed to the bank with notice for credit to the customer's account awaiting the branch employee to select "Release Funds."   This has not happened so while there is payment waiting to be released, it has not been released and therefore it has not been received by the customer.   The payments were only &1300.00 each approximately. The Bank nor the Monarch does not covet payments made pursuant to his laws.  Why would the monarch or any of their good associates be accused of wanting a citizen's benefit?  The Bank of England ensured compliance  with new regulations in addition to the take over with the function of crediting payments directly to the customer account turned into a robotic automated function for all payments under $40,000.00.  Some in the bank interrupted the system and would not select "Release Funds" in some interruption of formality until they were sure the recipient was a church member and he is and others would not release funds until they were sure he donated to some church and he did. Others did not release funds until they were sure he had sat in the branch for at least 40 minutes and he did.  He is not the bank teller's father; certainly not.  Then one person said that because he is a formal graduate with A Levels, that they would like to give him the money in his coffin as some expression of her hatred of those with formal education.    The tellers had jobs and they also received this income supplement benefit while they continued in this course of thievery in the bank of the bank's money and the government's money as motivated by greed; greed of the co-accused also that shows up to receive  the cash as many of them were recieving  the benefit also.   Some wanted to think that some retired pub king was hoping to show his pub lady wife how he could kill this  A- level college graduate and steal the food service ideas that he presented in his business school class; something about Frost Byte Pastries(TM) or London Pub Pizza Co (TM). The Pub King could buy this concept for $9000.00.       She was not thinking anything like it and told him to just fix the little problem so the boy could have his little money or otherwise, she would thinking of him the way he behaves.  The Retired Pub King could see if he can take this company out of its dormancy and make something of it.   

LONDON PUB CO LIMITED

Company number 03174857

  

Qui prendere speras, regem non habes. Non es rex.

No matter what, an African Bushman's success in his independence is his success in legal and economic formalism to satisfy the global capitalist economy with certain consumer markets with sufficient consistent buying power achieved by a secure and regularly funded population. Article 25 of the UDHR is about Capitalism and maybe tourism when tourists do not want to see human suffering nor sense it in the population. Paying all citizens an income support is consistent with a genuine nationalism, genuine integrity, a genuine sincerity in national defense. If you don't respect the lives of your people with a little money paid to them monthly but calculated hourly at $9.00 per hour 365 days per year, what are you doing ordering more and more fighter jets? I think a small country like Canada can have some fun with 30 fighter jets and we can pay for them using the current sales tax that will also pay for the $9.00 per hour income support benefit paid equally to all citizens as consistent with the intent to defend and protect all of their lives. He who has the most people in his economy buying products and generating sales tax wins. The Canadian Social Insurance number is really a UK number and the sales tax generated in Canada is part of the UK collection with the Canadian territory as an overflow territory for the UK if they wish to see it this way. You notice that the current income support issue has indicated that any citizen regardless of race in Ottawa or Windsor etc receives their income support. Even so, ignorance in some people persists. Green( that is money). is the mediator and the common language among us all.

This is the answer in the very end for the bushman and that is legal formalities even if he spent a lot of time resisting the formalism of a colonial power to achieve his independence. S.15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is legal formalism. Article six of the US Constitution is legal formalism. An economy without an income support for all citizens exposed a segment or group of its population to moneyless-ness that is consistent with conditions of life calculated to bring about physical destruction. It offends S.15 of the Charter. It offends Article 6 of the US Constitution as naughty people hoping to be accepted by Europe.

Governments like this, new or old, do not need enemies as they stand in that space as an enemy to itself as the Bushman has come to understand. They know the problem and continue in a course of action unabated.

There are a set of individuals engaged in politics that are challenging legal and constitutional formalities, that show no tenderness or care to address the proverbial thorn in the dog's paw or the hurt suffered by many citizens in the unequal provision of income support in their economy. Instead of responding and resolving it with capitalist motivation or nationalistic fervor. They say instead that the population can sue.

Those funding such governments engaged in this activity are aiding and abetting genocide and UN violations generally (Article 25 of the UDHR) if they do not demand that the defaulting government regularise their socioeconomic programs and stop the victimising of an identifiable segment of their population. See the Nottebohm judgement at the World Court or the Rutaganda case.