Jack Semith does not know I have the votes and interrupted the election. Donald has every right to contest what I did. But, I never did. Donald will use his Executive Powers to restore order and maintain his own interim government until a new election with new votes; fair and free of interruption can be held. The current government is his government. He invoked his emergency powers in 2020 and they are still in effect to dismiss this annoying indictments. No Congress under the 12th amendment approved of Joe in this case with the missing votes. Not knowing what to do when Joe stole the votes is not when we approve of Joe's theft in an unresolved election debacle. Jack Semith does not know I have the votes and interrupted the election. Donald has every right to contest what I did. But, I never did. Donald will use his Executive Powers to restore order and maintain his own interim government until a new election with new votes; fair and free of interruption can be held. The current government is his government. He invoked his emergency powers in 2020 and they are still in effect to dismiss this annoying indictments. No Congress under the 12th amendment approved of Joe in this case with the missing votes. Not knowing what to do when Joe stole the votes is not when we approve of Joe's theft in an unresolved election debacle. I'm only joking. Jack Semith is the conspirator and the interrupter. There is nothing genuine about this process if the whereabouts of the votes is not the primary issue or question. The stolen votes and mail bags are in Scotland with 94% likelihood. Donald is only insisting on what the 12th amendment requires. He has emergency powers in such uncharted waters with stolen votes and with an evident conspiracy to predetermine the election result to use his emergency powers for as long as he wants while Joe and his colleagues can pretend to have been elected. As such, a President could be challenged on an ongoing basis but still President. Regardless of how many people insist on pretending that Joe is not in direct challenge of law and order, it is evident that Donald is still the President. What benefits Joe is that he is betting on the majority of Americans suffering from dyslexia when it comes to rules, formulas and legal scintillation in Constitutions. It is evident that the CNN news castors are innocent Joe co conspirators in their dyslexia. Because if there dyslexia, they are innocent. How do interrupt their dyslexia? A gag order issued by a Court restraining CNN is required and arresting them if they do not cease and desist in their insistence that we know of any winner concerning the 2020 election; in particular Joe. Forget the gourmet Columbian beans on their breath or the feeling of Hudson river water in their veins. They are just dressed up stooges and possibly certainly in violation of US code 18 for every dollar they have taken from Democrats to support the Democrat agenda. But, every time CNN asserted Joe won is a criminal offence. The appearance of Joe on a news magazine as the next President prior to the election was a criminal offence. It should not have been tolerated. It was illegal but it is also evidence of the crime that was also followed by the stolen "mail in" votes. The two events in succession are evidence of a serious intent to predetermine the election result; a result that is impossible to quantify with the votes stolen and buried under Joe's house. But, based on Joe's legal disqualification, we could confidently say Donald won. Otherwise, it is not possible to achieve these 12th amendment requirements when the votes were stolen. This is a critical fact in the agreed statement of facts. Under US law, there is no crime or violation committed here and no other or unlawful act except Donald insisting on the due election process or what remedies there may be in such tremendous failure of the process never encountered before; such as stolen votes. You heard when he told people that he knows nothing about to just go home. The key word before tomorrow morning and the cancelled arrest and arraignment is the word "votes." Where are they; the votes? It is not a sin to say you think you won with the votes evidently missing and any count or recount rendered impossible. Let's be honest. This may be uncharted territory while evidently sometimes adults can act like children with board game rules or with the laws involving an election. Donald has committed no crime but a crime was committed prior to and during the election. It would seem that the law required a vote in Congress where Donald would have won with Joe legally disqualified under the law under US code since he was in receipt of Treasury funds and not exempted as a current President or Vice President. He could have resigned while also appointing himself a Voluntary director and then also arranging his salary to be paid to him as a voluntary stipend for the same amount while campaigning. Click here. Jack Semith is the conspirator and the interrupter. The stolen votes and mail bags are in Scotland with 94% likelihood. Donald is only insisting on what the 12th amendment requires. He has emergency powers in such uncharted waters with stolen votes and with an evident conspiracy to predetermine the election result to use his emergency powers for as long as he wants while Joe and his colleagues can pretend to have been elected. As such, a President could be challenged but still President. The appearance of Joe on a news magazine as the next President prior to the election was a criminal offence. It should not have been tolerated. It was illegal but it is also evidence of the crime that was also followed by the stolen "mail in" votes. The two events in succession are evidence of a serious intent to predetermine the election result; a result that is impossible to quantify with the votes stolen and buried under Joe's house. But, based on Joe's legal disqualification, we could confidently say Donald won. Otherwise, it is not possible to achieve these 12th amendment requirements when the votes were stolen. This is a critical fact in the agreed statement of facts. Under US law, there is no crime or violation committed here and no other or unlawful act except Donald insisting on the due election process or what remedies there may be in such tremendous failure of the process never encountered before; such as stolen votes. You heard when he told people that he knows nothing about to just go home. The key word before tomorrow morning and the cancelled arrest and arraignment is the word "votes." Where are they; the votes? It is not a sin to say you think you won with the votes evidently missing and any count or recount rendered impossible. Let's be honest. This may be uncharted territory while evidently sometimes adults can act like children with board game rules or with the laws involving an election. Donald has committed no crime but a crime was committed prior to and during the election. It would seem that the law required a vote in Congress where Donald would have won with Joe legally disqualified under the law under US code since he was in receipt of Treasury funds and not exempted as a current President or Vice President. He was being paid as the director of his Vice Presidential Library while campaigning. He could have resigned while also appointing himself a Voluntary director and then also arranging his salary to be paid to him as a voluntary stipend for the same amount while campaigning. Certainly he is skillful and smooth; a smooth criminal. Click here. Written by Jack H Smith.

  Jack Semith does not know I have the votes and interrupted the election.    Donald has every right to contest what I did.  But, I never did. Donald will use his Executive Powers to restore order and maintain his own interim government until a new election with new votes; fair and free of interruption can be held. The It would be nice if we  had our own income support  paid to all UK British national and Ontario British national citizens universally and unconditionally, not just the transgenders,  so that we could participate equally in the global economy transacting through our own territory. 

Do you think you would ever see the prefecture of Osaka decide that it  needed to have enough national authority over Okinawa to say that it would cut Okinawa's income support in half to starve out the population to the death, hoping that the Okinawans would abandon their properties and then the Osaka population would be able to occupy all of the newly empty homes and apartments in Okinawa in what is really a civil war? Then the population is cut in two. But, this is what Nova Scotia did to Ontario and who gave the Nova Scotians the authority to turn off the income support in Ontario? It has been going on for soo long that Nova Scotia is now cannibalising Second or third generations Nova Scotians who were born in Ontario where in Ontario, there is still no income support that is sufficient in good numbers to sustain the Ontario population.   The presumption is that Ontario is too Anglican or too resented as bigger and more posh  than Scotia.    How  can you imagine that anyone is more than you because of the postal code and attention given to that particular neighborhood to provoke the Scotian.  Its only Scarborough or Unionville or Newmarket so why starve them out and occupy the home illegally? Where is the owner? You are safe.   But, this game is over now.  Let's see how we can cooperate as one national community instead of Scotia working to be over the entire population with their half income support and lying low while all the other populations are being occupied by the Scotians.  That is civil war.  I  love Scotia. But. the gap in the two populations, Scotia and Ontario, is soo great that the foreign populations with income support have  been invited to help fill the gap. Watching Hockey high lights eh?;  and being the politician busy resenting his or her lack of formal education, however, as they hesitate in solving it is not the solution; eh?     We know how to solve it now.   A White politician mentioned it at church on Sunday at an Anglican congregation.  He says we just have to ensure all citizens have an equivalent income support. Its good for the economy and guarantees there is sufficient economic stimulus.  When it comes to how to afford it, you don't have to worry. Europe is paying for everything. You need to see how your sales tax is too low for a normal economy but that's ok.  Just agree to a total income support for every citizen amounting to $70,000.00 per year per citizen and your economy will normalise.  The immigration will continue and why not since you don't mind but at least you will not feel excluded and left out in your own economy. Clearly, you need more money. $20,000.00 per year is not really enough. in Scotia.  $38,000.00 per year is not enough in Quebec and the amounts paid to only some Ontario residents is not enough for the Ontario economy or the national economy.  The real question is why there are soo many foreign workers in the economy when the locals in Ontario need the job. government is his government.  He invoked his emergency powers in 2020 and they are still in effect to dismiss this annoying indictments.  No Congress under the 12th amendment approved of Joe in this case with the missing votes.  Not knowing what to do when Joe stole the votes is not when we approve of Joe's theft in an unresolved election debacle.      

   Jack Semith does not know I have the votes and interrupted the election.    Donald has every right to contest what I did.  But, I never did. Donald will use his Executive Powers to restore order and maintain his own interim government until a new election with new votes; fair and free of interruption can be held. The current government is his government.  He invoked his emergency powers in 2020 and they are still in effect to dismiss this annoying indictments.  No Congress under the 12th amendment approved of Joe in this case with the missing votes.  Not knowing what to do when Joe stole the votes is not when we approve of Joe's theft in an unresolved election debacle.        I'm only joking.  Jack Semith is the conspirator and the interrupter.

 There is nothing genuine about this process if the whereabouts of the votes is not the primary issue or question.

  The stolen votes and mail bags are in Scotland with 94% likelihood.  Donald is only insisting on what the 12th amendment requires.  He has emergency powers in such uncharted waters with stolen votes and with an evident conspiracy to predetermine the election result to use his emergency powers for as long as he wants while Joe and his colleagues can pretend to have been elected.  As such, a President could be challenged on an ongoing basis but still President.  

Regardless  of how many people insist on  pretending that Joe is not in direct challenge of law and order, it is evident that Donald is still the President. 

What benefits  Joe is that he is betting on the majority of Americans suffering from dyslexia when it comes to rules, formulas and legal scintillation in Constitutions. 

It is evident that the CNN news castors are innocent Joe co conspirators in their dyslexia. Because if there dyslexia, they are innocent. How do interrupt their dyslexia?    A gag order issued by a Court restraining CNN is required and arresting  them if they do not cease and desist in their insistence that we know of any winner concerning the 2020 election; in particular Joe. Forget the gourmet Columbian beans on their breath or the feeling of Hudson river water in their veins.  They are just dressed  up stooges and possibly certainly  in violation of  US code 18   18 USC Ch. 29: ELECTIONS AND POLITICAL ACTIVITIES    for every dollar they have taken from Democrats to support the Democrat agenda.  But, every time CNN asserted Joe won is a criminal offence.  


The appearance of Joe on a news magazine as the next President prior to the election was a criminal offence.  It should not have been tolerated. It was illegal but it is also evidence of the crime that was also followed by the stolen "mail in" votes.  The two events in succession are evidence of a serious intent to predetermine the election result; a result that is impossible to quantify with the votes stolen and buried under Joe's house.  But, based on Joe's legal disqualification, we could confidently say Donald won.    

Otherwise, it is not possible to achieve these 12th amendment requirements when the votes were stolen.  This is a critical fact in the agreed statement of facts. Under US law, there is no crime  or violation committed here  and no other or unlawful act except Donald insisting on the due election process or what remedies there may be in such tremendous failure of the process never encountered before; such as stolen votes.   You heard when he told people that he knows nothing about to just go home.    The key word before tomorrow morning and the cancelled arrest and arraignment is the word "votes."   Where are they; the votes?  It is not a sin to say you think you won with the votes evidently missing and any count or recount rendered impossible. Let's be honest.  This may be uncharted territory while evidently sometimes adults can act like children with board game rules or with the laws involving an election.  Donald has committed no crime but a crime was committed prior to and during the election.  It would seem that the law required a vote in Congress where Donald would have won with Joe legally disqualified under the law under US code since he was in receipt of Treasury funds and not exempted as a current President or Vice President.    He could have resigned while also appointing himself a Voluntary director and then also arranging his salary to  be paid to him as a voluntary stipend for the same amount while campaigning. Click here.    Jack Semith is the conspirator and the interrupter.   The stolen votes and mail bags are in Scotland with 94% likelihood.  Donald is only insisting on what the 12th amendment requires.  He has emergency powers in such uncharted waters with stolen votes and with an evident conspiracy to predetermine the election result to use his emergency powers for as long as he wants while Joe and his colleagues can pretend to have been elected.  As such, a President could be challenged but still President.  The appearance of Joe on a news magazine as the next President prior to the election was a criminal offence.  It should not have been tolerated. It was illegal but it is also evidence of the crime that was also followed by the stolen "mail in" votes.  The two events in succession are evidence of a serious intent to predetermine the election result; a result that is impossible to quantify with the votes stolen and buried under Joe's house.  But, based on Joe's legal disqualification, we could confidently say Donald won.    

Otherwise, it is not possible to achieve these 12th amendment requirements when the votes were stolen.  This is a critical fact in the agreed statement of facts. Under US law, there is no crime  or violation committed here  and no other or unlawful act except Donald insisting on the due election process or what remedies there may be in such tremendous failure of the process never encountered before; such as stolen votes.   You heard when he told people that he knows nothing about to just go home.    The key word before tomorrow morning and the cancelled arrest and arraignment is the word "votes."   Where are they; the votes?  It is not a sin to say you think you won with the votes evidently missing and any count or recount rendered impossible. Let's be honest.  This may be uncharted territory while evidently sometimes adults can act like children with board game rules or with the laws involving an election.  Donald has committed no crime but a crime was committed prior to and during the election.  It would seem that the law required a vote in Congress where Donald would have won with Joe legally disqualified under the law under US code since he was in receipt of Treasury funds and not exempted as a current President or Vice President.   He was being paid  a pension.  He could have assigned it to be paid to his foundation.    Certainly he is skillful and smooth. Your watch is missing.      



Written by Jack  H Smith. 

Comments