Neo Cannibalism is a new term and may also address the tendency of the cannibal to not necessarily eat flesh of others but attempt to eat the food, live on or in the belongings or property of others as achieved by theft and property occupation. This Neo Cannibalism identifies itself in obsessive sibling rivalry and some anxiety or impatience to see elders pass on and about who is getting what for inheritance. The song Down with OPP; You Know Me" may have been evidence of this. It may also express itself as plagiarism in academia and is one reason why it is frowned upon. Yet we see how a cannibal's sense of hegemony can manifest into an F 16 jet etc but he has still failed to feed his own and cover his own people with sufficient money as he is still set on eating or cannibalizing them (or their property) in a Neo Cannibalism; a low level of expression of Neo Cannibalism does not manifest in the actual consumption of the physical being as we suggest but in a denigration of the target being and a consumption of his property where you find it so hard to grant them the mutual dignity you grant to others as kin when you see them as different possibly due to attainment in basic education; something that is still frowned upon by many in the Neo Cannibal communities.

Neo Cannibalism is a new term and may also address the tendency of the cannibal to not necessarily eat flesh of others but attempt to eat the food, live on or in the belongings or property of others as achieved by theft and property occupation. This Neo Cannibalism identifies itself in obsessive sibling rivalry and some anxiety or impatience to see elders pass on and about who is getting what for inheritance.   The song Down with OPP; You Know Me" may have been evidence of this.  It may also express itself as plagiarism in academia and is one reason why it is frowned upon.  Yet we see how  a cannibal's sense of hegemony can manifest into an F 16 jet etc but he has still yet failed to feed his own and cover his own national people with sufficient income support money as he is still set on cannibalizing them (or their property) in a Neo Cannibalism; a low level of expression of Neo Cannibalism does not manifest in the actual consumption of the physical being as we suggest but in a denigration of the target being and a consumption of his property where you find it so hard to grant them the mutual dignity you grant to others as kin when you see them as different possibly due to attainment in basic education; something that is still frowned upon by many in the Neo Cannibal communities.   

Please read an excerpt from an article on the concept of Neo Cannibalism.  See here below.  

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) |Volume III, Issue VIII, August 2019|ISSN 2454-6186 Neocannibalism: An Analytical MedicoJurisprudential Appraisal of Contemporary Dimensions in Organ Theft and Trafficking Dr. Ifeanyi E. Anigbogu1, Prof. P. E. O. Oguno Ph.D2 1MD (General Medicine). M.I.S.B.T, Ph.D (Surgery), LLB (Hons), BL (Hons), LLM , Ph.D (Law),Specialist Surgeon Solicitor and Advocate of the Supreme Court of Nigeria Lecturer, Faculty of Law, Madonna University, Okija, Nigeria 2Dean, Faculty of Law, Anambra State University, Anambra State Nigeria (Now Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University) Abstract: - When in 195BC Fitus Maccius Plautus wrote “Asinaria”, generally regarded as one of the Great Roman Comedies, and which was renowned for containing the phrase “Homo homini lupus est – man is a wolf to his follow man”, the temptation must have been to relegate the statement to the realms of fiction. Contemporary events however prove to the contrary. Galloping advancements in science and technology, particularly in the fields of Medicine and Transplantology, have made the statement extremely germane. Scientific innovations have improved the quality and standard of life in developed countries, occasioned an increase in life expectancy and induced active longevity. Sequel to this, the demand for organs and tissues for transplant is on the increase, compelling scientists and mankind generally, to question the rationale in the wasteful disposal of organs and tissues of cardavas and indeed whether or not there should continue to exist legal or moral justification in the non commodification of the human body. Consequently law has been brought face to face with the bizarre phenomenon of neocannibalism – a situation where human beings organize and orchestrate the consumption (cannibalization) of fellow humans, sanctified by the medical mantra of saving lives. This work is a humble attempt by the author to draw the attention of medico-legal science and international law to the novel anti-human practice, analyze same and proffer solutions. Key Words: Homicidal cannibalism, Endo and Exo cannibalism, Necrocannibalism, bio-lust, bio-terrorism. I. INTRODUCTION H uman cannibalism is the act or practice of humans eating the flesh or internal organs of other human beings. A person who practices cannibalism is called a cannibal. The word cannibalism is derived from Canibales, the Spanish name for the Caribs1, a West Indies tribe that may have practiced cannibalism2 , from Spanish Canibal or Caribal “a savage”. It is also called anthropophagy.  1https://en.m.wikipedia.org.cannibalismdefinition.dictionary.com  2Cannibalism (human onlineEncyclopedia.res.August31.2013 behavior). Britannica In some societies, especially tribal societies, cannibalism is a cultural norm. 1.1 Endocannibalism Consumption of a person from within the same community is called endocannibalism, and ritual cannibalism of the recently deceased can be part of the grieving process,3 or be seen as a way of guiding the soul of the dead into the bodies of living descendants.4 1.2 Exocannibalism This is the consumption of a person from outside the community, usually as a celebration of victory against a rival tribe.5 Both types of cannibalism can also be fuelled by the belief that eating a person’s flesh or internal organs will endow the cannibal with some of the characteristics of the deceased.6 In most parts of the world, cannibalism is not a societal norm, but is sometimes resorted to, in situations of extreme necessity, and has involved mainly necrocannibalism, i.e the eating of the corpse of somebody who is already dead, as opposed to homicidal cannibalism – killing someone for food. Homicidal cannibalism is always considered a crime, even in the most trying circumstances. The case of R.V. Dudley and Stephen, in which two men were found guilty of murder for killing and eating a cabin boy while adrift at sea in a life boat, set the precedent that necessity is no defence in a charge of murder. Certain authors have on a wider scale, defined cannibalism as the act that involves consuming all or part of another individual of the same species as food. It is stated that to consume the same species, or show cannibalistic behavior is a 3Woznick, Andrew N. (1998) Endocannibalism of the Yanomami. The Summit Times.6 (18-19) 4Dow James W “cannibalism” in Terenbaum Barbara A (ed) Encyclopedia of Latin American History and Culture   Vol. 1 New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. Pp. 535 - 537 5Ibid  6 Goldman, Laurence, ed (1999). The Anthropology of cannibalism