Click here. It would seem that Jesus was the victim of multi culturalism and misinterpretation before the Court where he may have been in need of translation. It seems that any Assyrian Herod would not have been speaking Arabic or Hebrew in that day fluently but maybe only partially. He spoke an Assyrian language while the Sanhedrin and the Pharisees spoke Hebrew. Jesus had been raised in Arabic Egypt from birth. The Romans there spoke Latin and recorded everything that happened. We see that Jesus would have been speaking Arabic to Herod at the time of their conversation where Jesus says,,,it is the Pharisees who say something about king of Israel but Jesus denies that he ever claimed it but it is what his attackers say. We see this in the gospel. He might have said he was an orphan somewhat humorously when he said he was the son of God. He was a Rabbi and teacher and taught with authenticity having graduated from a temple in Egypt by 12 years old. The power of the gospel is the power of multi culturalism and the power of history. It is where you see the aboriginal peoples of Egypt and Israel were synonymous with Arabic and the occupiers who became the official ruling population spoke Hebrew although they were not the original or aboriginal peoples who will remain with the lands forever. We remember the power of the gospel and the trinity. Haile means in Ge'ez "Power of" and Selassie means trinity—therefore Haile Selassie roughly translates to "Power of the Trinity". We remember the power of the animal as there could be a strain of Herod DNA that steals your things in an attempt to cannibalise and tries to interrupt those who believe they can follow the rules and succeed, graduate from high school the first time, go on to college and help people as a member of society as one would wish to be helped. There is a female Herodian who seeks the soul and life of that worker, the servant who believes society with government can work simply. The Herodian challenges this simple work where we collect the tax and then pay the benefits equally to all persons and citizens involved. This is the power of the animal who asks so many questions about the tax to Caesar/ to the government and the equal benefits to be paid to all citizens, about marriage and adultery that he might have ate off the floor if you did not stop him and then he or she asked why or what was wrong if he did and maybe he did not wash his hands. Jesus explains marriage also and what to do with the woman. You stay and eventually you are sure and she is sure of who is the father. But, when she does not stay with anyone for long or has not been with anyone then it is the immaculate child in her; possibly the child conceived with the waters of her ancestors from a sip of her father's or grandfather's beer, wine or water and the semen therein is the Shanghai suprise; and immaculate. We know she has not been with anyone so Herod asks who is the father? It's a miracle and the child has to be someone's or it is God's? Did the baker spit or put his seed in the aeoli or the sauce? This is the power of the animal when he would resent and kill if you try to explain the issue. Adultery is to add or change the ingredients and knowingly. Kids take a sip of their friend's drink and get a virus; accidental communion with a cousin maybe in a friendship handshake? But someone putting your toothbrush in the toilet; that is adultery since the intention is not commitment but to dilute. You see him eventually agree and confess as seen in Romans 7 and 1st John 1:9 as it may take a while in the power of the animal to develop a conscience on any issue. If we confess our sins, the God of our souls is faithful and just to forgive us and cleanses us of all unrighteousness. In this case it might be the sin against his or her own body. It would always be one group in the minority trying to get the power to abuse the power so to kill the others. It does not happy often but then why is it that there are some people who are not receiving their income support? This Herod strain comes in all colors. He came from an honored culture; the Assyrians who had been called to occupy Israel. Yet, there seems to have been many questions this Herod had for the Rabi about the meaning of anything and everything. He was, in his time, honored albeit beset by problems in translation. We see something else. We see that he decided to say that if he is anyone because of his ancestral comprehension of Leviticus and the law due to His ancestry, the problem for Herod is when Herod says law and authority are one and Herod should not hear of anyone who is a teacher of the law and not a Babylonian it seems. If Jesus was Babylonian or Assyrian, it would have been ok. The issue then was a cultural hegemony and Jesus' immediate ancestors were not the ruling authority but the occupiers. So, while Jesus is innocent he is put to the test over and over by the occupiers. They try to catch him. This is about Jesus and we must be over this type of thing. Would it happen today? Why? The bible says, Berean Standard Bible How much more, when wicked men kill a righteous man in his own house and on his own bed, shall I not now require his blood from your hands and remove you from the earth!” The bible says Wisdom 2:12-22 12 "Let us lie in wait for the righteous man, because he is inconvenient to us and opposes our actions; he reproaches us for sins against the law, and accuses us of sins against our training. 13 He professes to have knowledge of God, and calls himself a child of the Lord. 14 He became to us a reproof of our thoughts; 15 the very sight of him is a burden to us, because his manner of life is unlike that of others, and his ways are strange. 16 We are considered by him as something base, and he avoids our ways as unclean; he calls the last end of the righteous happy, and boasts that God is his father. 17 Let us see if his words are true, and let us test what will happen at the end of his life; 18 for if the righteous man is God's son, he will help him, and will deliver him from the hand of his adversaries. 19 Let us test him with insult and torture, that we may find out how gentle he is, and make trial of his forbearance. 20 Let us condemn him to a shameful death, for, according to what he says, he will be protected." 21 Thus they reasoned, but they were led astray, for their wickedness blinded them.... The officials as occupiers may not have known the law and the teaching with its Egyptian origins as confirmed in Moses experience and sharing with the people Israel on Mount Sinai as God led him; and many in that hierarchy were caught in the seeking of social influence and authority; not seeking the proliferation of kin and family. It looks like Jesus encountered the hungry multitude very often but this is probably because the ration or income support benefit was not being provided in the usual course but being withheld by Herod; like men today withhold the money for Americans to buy their gumbo. You are withholding the gumbo so how can you feel any American dignity or hegemony? We see that Jesus answered this hunger by turning dough and fish (five loaves worth and 7 fish) into fritters and fried them to feed the multitude. In a world of many dialects reading a story of actual history from land of cross crossing languages, five loaves and seven fish as the essential ingredients of the miracle is the inerrant gospel miracle. Maybe trace elements of the story did not survive the work of translation but we can see and know it happened “One should not make light of any custom, even a simple one. Anyone for whom it is appropriate (with the financial means) is required to make a feast with merriment and food, to publicize the miracle that God did for us in those days. It is a popular custom to make “suphḡanin”, in Arabic “assfinj”, covered in honey, and in Aramaic, “isqeriṭaṿan“. This is an ancient custom, since they are fried in oil, in remembrance of [God’s] blessing.”. Click here.

 Click here.  It would seem that Jesus was the victim of multi culturalism and misinterpretation before the Court where he may have been in need of translation.  It seems that any Assyrian Herod would not have been speaking Arabic or Hebrew in that day fluently but maybe only partially. He spoke an Assyrian language while the Sanhedrin and the Pharisees spoke Hebrew. Jesus had been raised in Arabic Egypt from birth.  The Romans there spoke Latin and recorded everything that happened.  We see that Jesus would have been speaking Arabic to Herod at the time of their conversation where Jesus  says,,,it is the Pharisees who say something about king of Israel but  Jesus denies that he ever claimed it but it is what his attackers say.  We see this in the gospel.  He might have said he was an orphan somewhat humorously when he said he was the son of God.  He was a Rabbi and teacher and taught with authenticity having graduated from a temple in Egypt by 12 years old.    

The power of the gospel is the power of multi culturalism and the power of history.  It is where you see the aboriginal peoples of Egypt and Israel were synonymous with Arabic and the occupiers who became the official ruling population spoke Hebrew although they were not the original or aboriginal peoples who will remain with the lands forever.  We remember the power of the gospel and the trinity.  Haile means in Ge'ez "Power of" and Selassie means trinity—therefore Haile Selassie roughly translates to "Power of the Trinity".

We remember the power of the animal as  there could be a strain of Herod DNA that steals your things in an attempt to cannibalise and tries to interrupt those who believe they can follow the rules and succeed, graduate from high school the first time, go on to college and help people as a member of society as one would wish to be helped.  There is a female Herodian who seeks the soul and life of that worker, the servant who believes society with government can work simply.  The Herodian challenges this simple work where we collect the tax and then  pay the benefits equally to all persons  and citizens involved.  This is the power of the animal who asks so many questions about the tax to Caesar/ to the government and the equal benefits to be paid to all citizens, about marriage and adultery that he might have ate off the floor if you did not stop him and then he or she asked why or what was wrong if he did and maybe he did not wash his hands.  Jesus explains marriage also and what to do with the woman.  You stay and eventually you are sure and she is sure of who is the father.  But, when she does not stay with anyone for long or has not been with anyone then it is the immaculate child in her; possibly the child conceived with the waters of her ancestors from a sip of her father's or grandfather's beer, wine or water and the semen therein is the Shanghai suprise; and immaculate. We know she has not been with anyone so Herod asks who is the father? It's a miracle and the child has to be someone's or   it is God's?  Did the baker spit or put his seed in the aeoli or the sauce?  

 This is the power  of the animal when he would resent and kill  if you try to explain the issue. Adultery is to add or change the ingredients and knowingly. Kids take a sip of their friend's  drink and get a virus; accidental communion with a cousin maybe in a friendship handshake?   But someone  putting  your toothbrush  in the toilet; that is adultery since the intention is not commitment but to dilute.    You see him eventually agree and confess as seen in Romans 7 and 1st John 1:9 as it may take a while in the power of the animal to develop a conscience on any issue. If we confess our sins, the God of our souls is faithful and just to forgive us and cleanses us of all unrighteousness.  

 In this case it might be the sin against his or her own body. 

It would always be one group in the minority trying to get the power to abuse the power so to kill the others.  It does not happy often  but then why is it that there are some people who are not receiving their income support?

This Herod strain comes in all colors.  He came from an honored culture; the Assyrians who had been called to occupy Israel. Yet, there seems to have been many questions this Herod had for the Rabi about the meaning of anything  and everything. He was, in his time, honored albeit beset by problems in translation.    We see something else.  We see that he decided to say that if he is anyone because of his ancestral comprehension of  Leviticus and the law due to His ancestry, the problem for Herod is when Herod says law and authority are one and Herod should not hear of anyone who is a teacher of the law and not a Babylonian it seems.   If Jesus was Babylonian or Assyrian, it would have been ok.  The issue then was a cultural hegemony and Jesus' immediate ancestors were not the ruling authority but the occupiers. So, while Jesus is innocent he is put to the test over and over by the occupiers.  They try to catch him.    This is about Jesus and we must be over this type  of thing. Would it happen today? Why?  

The bible says,

Berean Standard Bible
How much more, when wicked men kill a righteous man in his own house and on his own bed, shall I not now require his blood from your hands and remove you from the earth!”

The bible says

Wisdom 2:12-22

 

12 "Let us lie in wait for the righteous man, because he is inconvenient to us and opposes our actions; he reproaches us for sins against the law, and accuses us of sins against our training.

13 He professes to have knowledge of God, and calls himself a child of the Lord.

14 He became to us a reproof of our thoughts;

15 the very sight of him is a burden to us, because his manner of life is unlike that of others, and his ways are strange.

16 We are considered by him as something base, and he avoids our ways as unclean; he calls the last end of the righteous happy, and boasts that God is his father.

17 Let us see if his words are true, and let us test what will happen at the end of his life;

18 for if the righteous man is God's son, he will help him, and will deliver him from the hand of his adversaries.

19 Let us test him with insult and torture, that we may find out how gentle he is, and make trial of his forbearance.

20 Let us condemn him to a shameful death, for, according to what he says, he will be protected."

21 Thus they reasoned, but they were led astray, for their wickedness blinded them....

 The officials as occupiers may not have known the law and the teaching with its Egyptian origins as confirmed in Moses experience and sharing with the people Israel on Mount Sinai as God led him; and many in that hierarchy were caught in the seeking of social influence and authority; not seeking the proliferation of kin and family. 

It looks like Jesus encountered the hungry multitude very often but this is probably because the ration or income support benefit was not being provided in the usual course but being withheld by Herod; like men today withhold the money for Americans to buy their gumbo. You are withholding the gumbo so how can you feel any American dignity or hegemony?     We see that Jesus answered this hunger by turning dough and fish (five loaves worth and 7 fish) into fritters and fried them to feed the multitude.  In a world of many dialects reading a story of actual history from land of cross crossing languages, five loaves and seven fish as the essential ingredients of the miracle is the inerrant gospel miracle.  Maybe trace elements of the story did not survive the work of translation but we can see and know it happened 

“One should not make light of any custom, even a simple one. Anyone for whom it is appropriate (with the financial means) is required to make a feast with merriment and food, to publicize the miracle that God did for us in those days. It is a popular custom to make “suphḡanin”, in Arabic “assfinj”, covered in honey, and in Aramaic, “isqeriṭaṿan“. This is an ancient custom, since they are fried in oil, in remembrance of [God’s] blessing.”3.

Suphḡanin and asqariṭin are given in the Talmud as two types of dough exempt from the obligation of taking Ḥalla (setting aside a portion of dough in commemoration of the obligation of the ancient Israelites to give a portion of their bread dough to the priests of the Temple).

There is a curious Ladino tradition of translating “manna” as “bumuelos”4: 

אי לייאמרון קאשה די ישראל אשו נומרי מאגנה; אי איל קומו שימיינטי די קולאנטרו בלאנקו, אי שו שאבור קומו בונייואילו קון מייל.

Manna, the miraculous food that sustained the Israelites in the desert, is compared in Numbers (11:8) to “cake in oil” (leShaḏ haShamen), and in Exodus (16:31) described as being “like ṣapiḥith in honey” (keṢapiḥith). Ṣapiḥith—which, frustratingly, appears only the one time in the Bible, leaving its precise meaning somewhat of a mystery—is most commonly translated into English as “wafer.” But in early Aramaic translations, ṣapiḥith was translated as “isqeriṭaṿan.” In the Mishna (Ḥalla 1:4) and the Talmud (Pesaḥim 37a) this word is modified to asqariṭin— and there it is listed alongside suphḡanin as one of the exempt doughs. So when we look at this chain of associations — ṣapiḥith with asqariṭin, asqariṭin with suphḡanin, and suphḡanin with assfinj/isfenj, which is, essentially, the same thing as a bumuelo, we can see how Judeo-Spanish translators came to translate ṣapiḥith as bumuelo. Which is exactly what they were doing: the first Judeo-Spanish translation of the Bible to be printed, in Istanbul in 1547, has the Israelites feasting on luscious bumuelos every day of the forty years they spend wandering in the desert.

Doesn’t sound so bad when you put it that way, does it?https://hasepharadi.com/2018/12/04/luqmat-a-little-fritter-with-a-long-history/

But, we see we have had a second coming, as many say, in Haille Selassie whose name means the Power of the Trinity. But then where is Herod; and who has time to harass a 13 year old and deny him his benefits; a kid who is a "no one" but a kid who hasn't done anything miraculous and who might get spanking for forgetting to sweep or wash the dishes before dad comes home?  

 There was a detachment from the people and their needs while Jesus answered their bodily needs. His teaching put hunger and bodily need into the gospel and it appears often with the Lord's response.  The teachings in the gospel are based much on the questions asked of him by the occupying culture and population from Babylon essentially; who spoke Hebrew. It was the teaching of the culture that enables family and communal cooperation; the commands of Moses are really a summary of the laws of Egypt and the laws of  communal civilization. You have property in your household and so does your neighbor. It should not be necessary that anyone should say this and teach it but maybe it had to be written and taught so  there is a diminution of conflict if you might  forget.  Leave your neighbor's stuff and your neighbour's people alone, quit spitting  in his water well in your fear that he will grow and multiply in family cooperation around you. You can have your own and if you have an idea as  to how you can both cooperate over the use of his man or female servant, then you make an agreement.  

That's it.  

Entwerfen TV