. A photo of young Canadians who have not received their income support Yet who live only 10 minutes from Oshawa or Richmond Hill. They say it infringes S. 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms when they are disenfranchised simply because they do not live in Barrie, Oshawa or Richmond Hill. January 7th, 2024. The North American economy is an inchoate economy and cannot function as a tiger economy or consistent bull economy. Income support for all citizens, nonetheless, is a normal capitalist economic custom. This Article is based on research by Warren A. Lyon who is a Canada Research Chair in Law and Economics at the Angel Ronan™ Foundation; Could you run an economy in such a way to achieve some anthropological, ancestral or developmental identity or is it to confirm some motive? Written by Cristobal Johansson, Junior Angel Ronan Economist. Click here. We have motions to allow Keffiyehs in the legislature before we address income support inequality with a motion to enforce benefit equality as outlined in our existing laws. See S.15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. But, we do tolerate Crosses and Turbans in the legislature as we talked about cultural symbolic equality. Now we just need to ensure we have benefit equality under the law. Did you know Warren A. Lyon is a Catholic? Our human experience is such a brief moment in time so what human anthropology or human soul would make it soo problematic and have it take soo long to resolve this benefit equality problem in accordance with our natural expectations in addition to our laws? Graphic designed by Warren A. Lyon from his economic research. Income support is consistent with a wall that was once used to keep the population in safety and protected from the wild elements of the outside world. Our economy is much like someone whipping, with commercials, a horse that has already passed out. It is underfunded. But, you could fund your national population and use them to express your belief, your mythology in the media about your North American global hegemony. You could use them with a simple variable to ensure all citizens in North America have no less than $35040.00 a year as income support. That works out to $4.00 per hour approximately. Instead, you bring foreigners to the economy who have more income support money than you do; and you have negated your hegemony at home and abroad as you do this in some contortion about the identity of the aboriginal self with many dna crisscrossing in the blood and also cross crossing in the mind and heart and the need to be accepted. Isn't it normal to make decisions that defend your sports team's hegemony? You wouldn't let the opposing team into your dressing room. Race is not the issue unless it is to put the Anglo or the North American into a globally underfunded racial classification as compared to other populations. Bingham was pointing out a general equality for all citizens under the law and in terms of government services and benefits. This is the general basis of law in the UK and Canada. We look to the white people in North America to do the good that white can do like find the lost balance in benefit equality, solve it by providing equal income support benefits to all citizens, fix the economic engine without resorting to the immigration of well funded foreigners who enjoy consistent income support benefits from their foreign economy, solve the sources of lost power in the economy and lost revenue without borrowing people with money and borrowing money itself from foreign economies. The white can do it to save us all. They fix things all day. They can fix it. These other populations buy as you die in your own home land. But, you also steal from them. You offer wild billions to defend something; the country and its population I hope but there are some glaring basics that are unresolved. You defend your population against problems like famine first of all. This is a basic principle. You do this in the modern world with an income support that automates much of the energy spent on needing to hand out rations. This simple commitment to a total and all encompassing income support will turn your economy into a tiger economy. While we could guarantee $4.00 an hour as a basic legal minimum, $8 an hour is recommended as paid to all citizens. It is cold most of the year. Then you defend your borders against foreign take over. Yet, when you say you will not feed your own people during a famine ( a job famine with moneyless-ness as caused by automation) and you say you would rather adopt others from another land who have enjoyed the world of automatic money paid to them regularly in amounts that give their population certainty in the ability to pay where they travel, you have missed the point and you say it should be ok because they are only hear from a communist country to rub your back and cook food for you and make you feel like you have the authority big pappa. But, you run social benefit policies that fail to defend the life of all citizens. It creates a resonance of sad inequality as festered illegally by public officials as if some want us to remember this pain from other eras before equality laws guaranteed at least a minimum equality in terms of government payment of benefits and services. You don't respect their lives so how do you say or what is the point of saying machine weaponry is needed to defend them? Some have received $20,000.00 per year as income support over the last 40 years. Some have received $50,000.00 per year. Some have received none; wrong location to receive some money support automatically or wrong gender if you are to receive it no matter where you live in Ontario. You can buy machines and ships for defense but the life of the population (your people) has not been defended yet. We need to defend all lives socioeconomically; equally. You are not sure who is writing this. You might wish to do something but not because the writer is white but because it is imperative for national defence. The Russians understood this. Is it that you like the feeling that some people get more than others in an unequal provision of public funds but everyone is paying the same income tax or sales tax rates? This is what "unequal" looks like but everyone is paying the same income tax or sales tax rates. The people in the NWT are taller than you or longer than you with the use of your tax dollars distributed unequally. -- $0 dollars per year Ontario income support since 1980. --------------------- $ 20,000.00 dollars per year Ontario income support since 1980. ----------------------------- $ 38,000.00 per year Quebec income support since 1980. ------------------------------------------- $50,000.00 per year Ontario transgender income support since 1980. ------------------------------------------------------------$70,000.00 per year income support since the year 2000 using your tax dollars in the NWT ( North West Territories). If a real North American Creole like Bingham with a natural sense of North American hegemony that was part French (seen above) brought the above problem to our attention as.....a team, how do you respond? What if he added Article 25 of the UDHR and said....you have been weighed, measured and found kind of weird like eggs for dinner if you can't just agree there is an issue affecting us all. Instead, you argue and offer billion dollar discounts on home heating costs to help Canadians. But, a discount on heating or affordable housing is great but unreachable, unattainable without money and its unfair when some citizens get more from our collective national assets than others when it is an asset pool to which we all have contributed. The people of Nova Scotia only get $20,000.00 per year as income support. The Quebecois only receive $38000.00 income support. This inequality can be resolved and why defend the retrograde policy, affecting your economy and your population where you take on large numbers of disappearing foreign citizens when this policy occurs as illegal policy expressing differential treatment before you were ever involved in politics? It offends s.15 of the Charter. But, if you were just a citizen receiving no income support or only $20,000.00 per year or only $50,000.00 per year, how would you respond genuinely if you could solve it? How would you solve it when you get less money than some other citizens and this is with money you pay as sales tax or income tax? If you are not dead, you should be disappointed with this. It means you have less significantly than others over 10 years or more. You have less ability to pay, to spend and enjoy the new housing that is promised. You have received less than others from our common tax pool. But, apparently you are in a job as an elected where you can solve this in how this inequality affects us. We appeal to you to help us. The Chinese, the South Asian Indians, Africans and the people from Richmond Hill or St. Catherine's have moved to Toronto and Toronto is obvious. It is just as crowded but with a more other world ethnic diversity. The white or Asian kid born in Ottawa or Richmond Hill with his family was not resident in Richmond Hill or Ottawa for his 14th birthday. They had moved to Guelph so he was not in receipt of his $20,000.000 per year income support automatically. It would have arrived automatically if he was in Ottawa with an Ottawa address or in Kitchener or Oakville but not Campbellford, King City, Orangeville or Kingston. You explained this weird problem as one white person to another white person and they say its obviously wrong. Its criminal mischief. Its an unequal provision of benefits. IT fails our genuine national defensive integrity, our capitalist motivations, nationalistic fervor and our legal compliance with the constitution and S.15 of the Charter. It's obvious and anyone can read the law and see the problem. So, you should not have to sue to see it resolved as there ae people in jobs with the job description to solve inefficiencies or Charter conflicts in policy. . It's like a hole in the line of defense. Do you play hockey or Rugby? He was supported by family and made an Ontario Wokes application when he was 19 years old. He played hockey with kids from Kitchener who received their $20,000.00 income support from 14 years old and who lived 5 minutes away. He was interviewed by two people earning $90,000.00 during his application. He qualified in every way as his accounts said he has less than $10,000.00 in his Canadian accounts but they denied him because they wanted to think he might have money as a gospel singer at people's weddings so they denied him his $10,000 per year income support. It looks like he received $1500.00 for gospel singing as a donation and it was in his bank account but he was still under the threshold and it was not employment money but a good will gesture payment. The people receiving $20000.00 per year just across the road in Richmond hill on the west side of Yonge Street or in Kitchener are not vetted this way. If you live in an Ontario Housing apartment with your Uncle on the east of Yonge Street in Markham, then you are vetted and means tested while they can see you do not even have $10000.00 while they have already provided $80000.00 as income support ($20,000.00 per year) to your school colleagues since they turned 14 years old who attend the same school but live on the west side of Yonge Street in Richmond Hill. You are not eligible for Ontario Wokes until you are 18 years of age.