By Zac Smith. This just in; as rumored, the UK government has now enabled all bank accounts held by citizens with a new feature that lets them set up an account transfer that will pay once or on a recurring basis the amount they are allotted as their monthly income supplement. Click here for more.

  

By Zac Smith.  

 This just in;     as rumored,   the UK government has now enabled all bank accounts held by citizens with a new feature that lets them set up an account transfer that will pay once or on a recurring basis the amount they are allotted as their monthly income supplement. Click here for more.      

Let's begin by saying the government payment is sacrosanct and must be credited where it is intended by the government in reasonable time; not later than 2 days after it is sent.  The bank as agent  will be allowed two days money market interest on the sums. The payments are made forthwith to the recipients.  The bank earns on the interest.  We prefer a self serve system; however as discussed below.   The bank will still earn money market interest as the aggregate sum held by the bank will increase and can be used on the market for the 24 to 48 hour loans.  The system will confirm to the bank the monthly allotment and the arrears outstanding. They will be able to  access the funds this way at any time. Essentially they will be releasing funds into their current account that might be on hold contrary to actual bank policy and banking rules; contrary to the intentions of the sender.  The system enables us to send or transfer money to the HMRC but we will   be allotted a function in the online banking system to order funds paid into our account directly from the DfE / NHS.  The DfE pays based on NHS policy.     The system will not allow more than what is outstanding as unpaid dating as far back as 1987 in some cases.

1.  Number one; is to ensure today for the upcoming set of  payments intended for next week that the citizens get their payments by paying their account numbers with sort code directly and not through any intermediary account offered by the banks and get the pirate evil off of our backs that asks the Great KIN "what he understands" and we dare not wait for the Great Kin to tell us to do our jobs when we see and know the problem just as we might see a man with a machine gun, pick pocketing people travelling openly with no fear of consequence on the Tube and using their oyster cards as he says, I want to know what the KIN really understands if its an electronic payment,,,.in Canada too also now that they stopped sending  benefit cheques."  The money in limbo is really a debt to the EU now any way. So the consumer banks are also in debt to the Bank of England. There is nothing  wrong  with gold  and our confidence in it but this misfeasance in the work robs us of our confidence when  the value and worth is being interrupted in the whole, entire system.  

We have our jobs as officers and there are officers in the banks also. So, the British national is technically an EU national and the EU says everyone must be safe and secure with their income support.  The banks will make the same set donations to various charities and political parties.  They will earn more; donate more and earn more  in the name of human hegemony;  and the public face for this campaign will be a White Swiss guy and woman for 3 months and an Indian looking Swiss guy for 3 months on all the advertising;  a black Swiss woman for 3 months and a Chinese Swiss woman for 3 months; or whatever it is you would like to do but the pirate schematics will not occupy and parasitically hamper the country any longer and then leave the country abandoned after it is done.  

  

2.  Secondly; we resend the payments(as arrears) to the same account if possible  and feasible that the customer can receive it or preferably that they receive it, we send it  to the newest,  most active account opened by the customer with the same NI number as they were unpaid by the bank dating back to 1987 or 1990 as the case may be and then recall the payments sent to the benefit recipients dating back to the date of non payment (1987 or 1990 or whenever the payments were missed) as unpaid but held in Limbo/Sundry and we can see it all on an Excel sheet as reconciled and prepared with the account statement data on a One to One basis.   

3.  Third; after this is done we confirm the arrears as noted in paragraph 2 above on a One To One basis. This means some people may be sent two payments a month in this final truth and reconciliation; One 2 One.    Alternatively, a "self serve" mechanism through online banking will  allow recipients to take an arrears payment once a month using a new direct transfer from the DfE "transfer in" option in their online banking system.

The sort code and the account number for the HMRC are maintained by Barclays and it goes through Barclays. There is a Bank of England sort code 10-00-00; however. We wonder why the HMRC is not maintaining its accounts at the Bank of England under the Bank of England sort code.

  A whole arrears payment of either £1700.00 or £2800.00 will be allowed in this direct transfer system but you can always take an additional £106.58 per day  up to  £1517.00 per month if your regular received and credited  payment is £1700.00

per month or you can get an additional £417.00 pounds per month if your regular payment is 2800.00 per month. The system is programmed to allow only a certain maximum amount per day or a certain maximum amount per month. 

If no payments are being made to your account due to the bank's interference although you have signed up for NHS, opened a bank account and have your NI card but the benefits payment is not crediting to your account for some unknown reason, so  you can set  up a recurring standing order of no more than  £105.76. pounds per day for a maximum of  £38,604.00 a year. You do not have to rob the bank if you feel you need more because of the smart phone fever you are suffering.

In fact, a whole arrears payment of the requisite amount ( £1700.00 or  £2800.00)  will be allowed by the system once a month since it is to ensure the government intention and its authority is achieved and for clarity in accounting purposes with one payment recalled from the Bank's sundry for one payment requested this way by the  beneficiary recipient; finally at £1700  or £2800.00.  We have chosen this self serve system. The Great Kin is honored.   He may reward us with an extra .50 pence an hour for hour cooperation. currently, our income support of 30,000.00 pounds per year works out to 3.42 an hour. This hourly analysis by Warren A. Lyon simplified and helps our discussion on how to fund this essential benefit because even Disney World must not only pay teachers and guides but must also fund the natural wild life in the park that must consist of people and a Kin. who is to receive as much income support for his house hold as he or she says they need. The income support in Florida is $2.51 per hour for $22,000.00 per year. The Great Kin is honored when he says we collectively benefit with an additional 1% per day in sales tax from Monday to Friday to 21%.  

 

The recipient will be able to see what is outstanding through a link to their current account's sundry of unpaid funds waiting to be released to the current account by the bank.  A message will be sent to the account holder's inbox confirming the amount in sundry automatically.  You can think of it as a "request for an income supplement payment" in the online banking funds transfer screen and It will be credited  to your account immediately.  It seems some banks are skipping payments every second month so the client is only receiving six payments per year; not 12.  Santander is guilty of this. The building society is skipping three a year.  We can pay the government directly from our accounts. We can order payments in from the government also if for some reason the funds have not been paid out. 

   The government's computer can recall a payment for every payment the customer has had to order that it be paid directly with the proof on the account that it was sent but not credited to the account after a payment  reconciliation, using the client account data.  It's not on the statement. Its in the sundry incoming wire payment account.   A payment is recalled if one was already made but it is not credited to the account so effectively the client remains unpaid.  

The Computer will debit the Sundry/General Recipient account for incoming payments and credit the DfE. 

They have "Entwerfen" designed a system that says we know the Bank of England as a bank can always pay the intended recipient client with his account sort code and account number, NI number and NHS number directly. The payment  will say DfE or NHS on the recipient account statement.  A German Bank will become the custodian partner by way of investment  in all UK regular commercial banks to help them comply.  The commercial and consumer  bank will make more on the money market loans that take place using the aggregate bank customer holdings. The sundry funds on hold are not used for this and nor can they be.   

If a drop of water that could grow into a full human being could carry resentment or ideas that they say they would have to express in public, in broad day light and threaten a UK government and its efforts to pay its citizens with many white and black victims how do we safeguard against this after they finish regular schooling?  There is a biometric "sign in" that can provide us information on capability and temperament in all job settings.  How long would it take for a defense minister to solve these issues and ensure all citizens are paid a uniform, equal amount for the safety and security of all intended recipients in the way the system is designed? You may not have a job but with your income support, you can enjoy while your anger against the system formalities says you will cause problems instead of help the general community enjoy the system. Buy me shoes then to make up for the shoes you stole. Where is my job offer? Where are my job documents?  You stole the mail. You stole the benefit payment advice but now they are sent by email.  

The benefit payment advices as well as information on the arrears are now sent by email. The payment of the benefit in your  account and also the scheme to pay down the arrears is now communicated by email....and who would want the citizens money for themselves as if the population and the economy do not need it?   

You were supposed to be just black but not black and a graduate from a regular high school program and involved in high school sports and education and music programs.  You should be just average.  

The banks will take on the economic improvement  and earn more money yearly in fees, interest and loans; not steal the money and send some to government charities or trusts when the bank could earn more on money market loans if they put the aggregate amount of customer holdings on 1 or  2 day money market loans.  Nothing leaves the client's account.  There will be more to loan this way.  The bank will make the same donations yearly; or more to the various charities on its standard donations list.  

There is no need for the recipient's bank to be involved as an intermediary recipient with staff that will intend to permanently deprive the government of its payment and the client recipient of the money to be credited; for more than ten years in an ongoing  deliberate scheme.  

This is truth and reconciliation for the artful dodger orphan resenting any family that would make their children attend school if it is about authority; this is truth and reconciliation for the South African racially confused;  this is truth and reconciliation for the pirate kind that wants to know if the customer knows and he will keep holding the funds until we are sure they know or we hope him or her dead any way  and do what  we want, set up our own policy as to what we think they should get since they get more than a Bahadian who designed Granta House to kill the English in North London.   He calls it his protocol as a 78 year old bitter drop out from a sociology programme at North London Polytechnic in 1980.  Maybe some people carry all three DNAs.  How did he do it, take over the banks in that region and the Job Centre?   He is in the Lidl food. He bought  the factory with his consistently paid income supplement from his country.  

There is no need to rob  the bank or anyone else.   If you are getting your  payments but partial  underpayments at less than £1700 per month, then you can ask for an extra  £100.00 per day as explained above with a monthly maximum of an additional £1800.00 per month as already explained.  

Some are receiving partial payments.  We see that the customer is receiving a %500.00 Barclays payment and someone else he ate with in their mother's presence when they were turning 12 years old is receiving a %1200.00 Barclays payment.  But, it should say %1700.00 DfE  payment on the statement.    How could this happen?  Who is deciding?  Why was he invited to eat with them only so that there is context to abuse them? 

There are some people, now old,  still sick about white hegemony who are early school leavers and who have black friends  and they are not really sure if his friend's black family was getting the full benefits but they always had a story to tell  and the older people said "we are humble people" just before they gave you a bottle of Pear Drax and a little food before grand dad drove off in the 1981 Audi for his checkers and dominoes.

  He could not have put pirate fickleness allowed  it in the system so could personally interrupt government business and ensure things are just how they always were as far as the story was told. Anybody in the branch can release the funds but no one does in many cases.  Some people always get their money but some do not.   But they were pretending with many whites and blacks as the victims  of this fickleness.  If the client  citizen does not get the payment in 24 hours after it was sent by the government, it is considered a failed payment.  The idea is that people are to be able to make plans, car payments, insurance payments and other family payments on time.  Once the client requests and receives his emergency payment to replace the failed direct payment through the online bank transfer system, the Government will request a recall of funds.  The issue is that the government can pay directly to the customer account through "CHAPS" or the "Faster Payment" system but when attempting to pay the customer through the bank's general account, the bank and it's staff have delayed applying or crediting payments to the intended customer account, engaging in some kind of  "we decide who will get the  income support" game and "hold" the government and its payment to its client recipient ransom, looking at the money unpaid everyday for years with the same creepy fascination about control one might get when looking at a stolen royal trinket in a box and you know people know exactly what you are doing. You have heard of Gulliver's travels; as interrupted.    

The system will confirm if income supplement funds are already available at the bank as funds to be released for the current monthly cycle.

  If not, new funds will be ordered in and credited to the account instantly. It will not be paid into the bank's general recipient account for incoming payments but directly to the current account for the recipient.  The government intends to pay and this is the evidence. Who is the urchin provoking a kind of stand off; asking the government if the urchin  will be killed for this mischief or if they will be chosen over the law and the government's intent to pay that recipient?    The client can request the funds be paid in monthly as a standing order or  the monthly amount can be divided in two for two separate payments per month. 

   But, they will not be left stranded at the mercy of temporary employees who refuse to release funds they see are waiting to be paid and they ignore it day in and day out; who ignore the alarm on the system designed to remind them; who pay out, as cash, the amount they see on the screen to be released at a rate of 4 to 1 to their buddies while the customer remains unpaid and hostage to this inexplicable anthropology.  

But, while we see  this is not a scenario that could happen in other economies with such a negligent mishandling of a government payment where this does not happen with VISA wire payments, it happens just where we do see it happening although we would like to call this mishandling something that must be from now on  the impossible. There will always be the criminal o the criminally minded that might get into a fiduciary job role in  bank corporation that has a national defense element to it,  but it will be impossible for such individuals to impede the bank's business or the government's business.  

Apparently, funds can also be retrieved at the Post Office in certain instances when the bank has failed to pay what was already remitted by the government to the bank for the  client.  The government can pay into the customer account directly debiting the requisite account and crediting the client; not to any general sundry incoming payments account where the government's business is being held up, disrespected and abused unnecessarily.