Countdown Timer to the new national income support at no less than $58800.00 per year although you can decide that it could be higher. This is not happening in Quebec. This is not happening in Manitoba. The Ontario economy is anomalous. It is the concern of many that the transgender groups are paid an income support but the non transgender are not being paid, so that this is gender inequality. But, it is also genocide. You deprive the male and female gender, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction. Gender inequality in any government policy is illegal and so is Gender genocide; that is gender genocide. Remember how you felt when you heard about female circumcision. It feels so heinous that you might have said also that it is gender genocide. But, is there a reason why gender genocide by virtue of material or financial starvation does not activate the shock at the inhumanity and the need for immediate redress? Click here.





Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce  the federal loan rate no lower than .5%.    The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate.  The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%.   it is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay  in the struggle with job automation as they already don't have any money so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy as the effort to solve it is national; isn't it ? You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon.    .  Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also.    



We could say it like this.    Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce  the federal loan rate no lower than .5%.    The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate.  The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%.   It is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay  in the struggle.  




We could say it like this.    Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce  the federal loan rate no lower than .5%.    The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop cannot be a zero rate.  The money, the national salaries and the coins carry a cost that demands payment with some rate at no less than .5%.   It is best , however, to increase consumer activity, and buying power by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay  in the struggle with job automation as they( the people) already don't have any money so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity is national; isn't it ? You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. It is best to raise the ATP; a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon.  Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also.  For PJ, give us the money. For PJ(peace and joy).  





We could also  say it like this as well.   Quantitative easing is a policy to reduce  the federal loan rate no lower than .5%.   The fed rate is reduced to provoke consumer economic activity but the buck stop concerning rate reduction cannot be a zero rate.          The paper money, the national salaries for security and cash delivery and the cost of "solver" in the coins carry a cost that demands payment with national revenue generating at  some rate  no less than .5%.     It is best, however, to increase consumer activity, and consumer buying power, that is consumer demand for goods by increasing ATP-ABILITY To Pay  in the struggle with job automation as they( the people)  do not  have any money already  so how can they qualify for the loan if they are not enabled with the ATP via a good, national income support policy;  as the effort to solve the reduction in consumer activity or increase it is a national effort ; isn't it ?  We can pay for this $70,000.00 per year income support with an increase in VAT/sales tax to a more international, responsible 20% to cover the cost of the income support and use this sales tax mechanism to increase and decrease consumer activity. Rising sales tax reduces activity. Decreasing the sales tax  rate increases the consumer activity(ACTIVITIES); never lower than 20% and never higher than 100%.      We can keep discussing Aboriginal emotions nonetheless.  You have a national dedication to a reduction in the fed rate so you are actually reducing national GDP further. This is not good.   It is best to raise the ATP(ability to pay);  a new economic concept coined by Warren A. Lyon.  Warren is a student of Adam Smith, Keynes and Sunkel, Wallerstein also.   The banks would prefer a customer who can maintain a loan than a customer who cannot. The ask should not think that the income support reduces business or that a shortage of income support increases business when it does not really increase business when the unpaid loan is unpaid business loan is a business right off.   Also, how do the citizens without income support qualify for the loans? 




 I am a Catholic Church Member and also an Anglican Church member.       Whether it's a powerful F15 fighter jet or the income support policy (also powerful), the question is your intentions. Maybe hatred and ignorance are also powerful economic forces that carry intention.  You ask yourself why are you reading this. David was successful as a Leader as he borrowed the well settled answers from Egypt involving economies.   His Egyptian wives, when they would sit at table with him, reminded him about the income support disbursements to the people.  Your policies can defend your people or destroy them. Your F15 can defend the population or fail to defend them maybe attack your own population.  Genocide can be visited on a population by an F15 carrying biological weapons or genocide can be visited on a population by a government that uses policies to starve the populations of requisite income support monies(requisite in an automation economy and all economies are ongoing automation economies dating back to Egypt), water or electricity.  F15's are designed to defend the nation and economic policies are designed to defend the nation with its entire population.  We thank God.



Top Gun Maverick is one of my favourite movies.  Thank God for Maverick and maybe he can use aerial acrobatics, some Top Gun Jiu Jitsu to ensure every North American has an income support. 

If every North American does not have an income support, it's an accident in policy but it carries some culpability; economically and legally.  Where is is your population with its disappearing home grown Twinkies  and Lipton Hegemony in exchange for a more Biriyani Hegemony and Sweet and Sour?  You don't mind and I don't mind but we need to at least be able to order the food and make the loan payments, pay the rent to the new more Asian owners of the Dominos Pizza.   


Read the following:  1945    Count 3 of the indictment of the 24 Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg Trials    They (the defendants) conducted deliberate and systematic genocide—viz., the extermination of racial and national groups—against the civilian populations of certain occupied territories in order to destroy particular races and classes of people, and national, racial or religious groups, particularly Jews, Poles, Gypsies and others.[8][9]


1946    Raphael Lemkin    The crime of genocide should be recognized therein as a conspiracy to exterminate national, religious or racial groups. The overt acts of such a conspiracy may consist of attacks against life, liberty or property of members of such groups merely because of their affiliation with such groups. The formulation of the crime may be as follows: "Whoever, while participating in a conspiracy to destroy a national, racial or religious group, undertakes an attack against life, liberty or property of members of such groups is guilty of the crime of genocide. ("Genocide", American Scholar, Volume 15, no. 2 (April 1946), p. 227–230)[9]


1959    Pieter N. Drost, Dutch law professor[11]    Genocide is the deliberate destruction of physical life of individual human beings by reason of their membership of any human collectivity as such. (The Crime of State, Volume 2, Leiden, 1959, p. 125.)[12][13]


Being North American does not exempt you from the scintilla of genocide, the real and deathly evident experience of Genocide either by water deprivation or from money deprivation. What if Joe lost his income support? He would be very angry right now. What if all of...Delaware became as convoluted as New York or Ontario or Pennsylvania in terms of income support? If the transgender groups are paid an income support but the non transgender are not paid, then this is gender inequality. But, it is also genocide. You deprive the male and female gender, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction. Gender inequality is illegal and so is Gender genocide; that is gender genocide.  You may say your concern is overcrowding in urban areas and it cannot be presumed that people living in urban areas are wealthier than those who live outside of them. You have also deliberately deprived people living in urban centres so that actually the people living outside of those centres are given an income support of maybe $20,000.00 per year in most but not all suburbs. This has taken place for years so there can be no presumption that only those living in urban centres are to be vetted again and again to see how they could live in Brampton or Loveumatemarket or Sufferbrough or Whickerby who get $10,000.00 per year if they do not have more than $40000.00 while they are not vetted at all but receive support automatically if they live in  Oakville or Richmond Hill  where they received $20000.00 per year automatically so then maybe urbanity is not the target issue or concern.  Even so, men and women who may receive $20,000.00 per year if they live in certain neighborhoods, are not receiving the $50,000.00 per year as received by transgenders who receive this money any where they live in Ontario.  


We see that based on  all the various economic issues and national concerns about consumer stimulus and to ensure the equal dispensation of Federal funds on all Canadians where Manitobans receive an income support of $50,000.00 per year, then on the question of the ethical and equal use of Federal funds for all citizens' benefits, then we say all the Ontario citizens should receive $70,000.00 a year as income support, keeping in mind the MPAC Ontario cost of living premium.   But, if you saw your son on national news struggling to solve even one side  of a Rubik's cube or solve this equation( 8 won ton soup  at $6.00 per bowl equals how much money?), what would you do?  I would probably say call the average Quebecois or Albertan where it is already solved for equality and for ensuring on purely economic principles that we have resolved also national consumer economic stimulus.          


There is not a shred of logic to the Ontario policy (COTYOU famille) where some people receive no money where they live if they are certain genders, some people receive some money and some people, the transgenders, receive $50,000.00 per year no matter where they live in Ontario.  Yet,  the legal obligation to equality is a paramount policy and so the obligation to avoid policy directions  that target or in any way create conditions of life calculated to destroy any target group is the concern.  You could offer free travel to families who live outside of  the urban centre.  Any journeys to enumerated stations in the suburbs and surrounding municipalities would be free. I would move out of Brooklin, Ontario for that and I would be able to afford the move with my income support of $40,000.00. $50,000.00, $60,000.00 or $70000.00 that would enable us to afford the move. But, you pay nothing to the male and female genders in Brooklin, Ontario. You pay nothing to the male and female genders in Guelph and what or where do you want us to move if Guelph is too urban or too crowded?  The reason why i am not interested in politics is because I can see everyone involved going back to the 1960's was some kind of Heroin abortion and this would include the current participants in politics.  Remember who wrote this.  It was not that poster "drop out" guy or "never went to school" guy. But, maybe if he had just cared  to see every Candadian and his own people born in Ottalwa at least get the $40,000.00 he receives as a citizen of this country in Queblec.  But, the unwillingness to at least do this over the last nearly ten years has led to a tacit closure of the government as we knew it and at that hour, we noticed that there was never really any more government  or country than what the BNA ACT 1867 allows. This is not a country legally.  There should be no flag and no currency but they let us testify about what we would do with the authority to feed ourselves for an hour longer.  You have until......noon to implement an income support of no less than $70,000.00 per year per Candadian and after that you will be dealing with the PM of the Republic of Iresland who will enforce an equivalent Rep. of Ireland policy on Irlish amounts of $EUD 40000.00 but converted to Candadian at 1.47CAD  to 1 EUD and this will also be implemented in the UK also after that deadline on an interim administrative management deal for the UK and its territories ...sort of like when an Italian was the coach for the FA.   But, I promise to always take nice photos and it looks like I will start a church fellowship and a small charity to assist people in understanding their legal defences. The government does not need a defence as it would have to accept the charges laid against its own genocidal action since you would say legally that they would agree to the facts although it may sue it self  or the relevant Ministry or Department sometimes to achieve its legal mandates.  In any case, genocide of the English population is not the way you apologise for many years of imperialism.  Africans live there now and many Asian peoples. They should not be starving and dying for the sins of the English as committed in previous generations. We are all God's children and all have sinned, falling short of the glory of God. Forgive as you wish to be forgiven and forgive yourself. Jesus did not throw the stone.     


There was a woman from  Bridgend who, in 1980, decided that she had to kill the world when she was told by her Welsh doctor that she is not going to be able to have children in spite of her bra size; that she was transgender.  She said, "watch me now" and proceeded to try to understand herself in the bible.  She found Salome' and decided that she could demand something but John the Baptist moved before anything bad could happen to him and went to a place called Soas; a town in Alexandria to be a teacher of the faith.  He appears later as Barnabas.  In any event, she bought the operator of the UK economy with her income support and some licks so that it would only pay those who were her kind and then she moved to Ontario; to hide.  She asked the operator in Ontario and for a few licks more the support shut off in 1983. The Ontario operator whipped it and she then decided, for a few licks more,  that only Law School drop outs would be able to get a government job in the profession.    But, who is she that the economy is diffident and genocidal, arguing with the global economic agenda that seeks to  achieve an automated ATP for each citizen to match the automated supply of goods; as produced  by robotic automation.  Maybe should could have said those who raise children get an extra $500.00 per month until the children reach the age of 14 when their UK national or Canadian national support would be initiated.  We should whip it back the other way then; eh?    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhNPAEirwPs  Crack that whip. Give the past a slip. When a problem comes along, you must whip it.  She seems to be literally Salome' from another dead sea urn found in Palestine on the coast of the Dead sea.  But, nature made us all. Don't we have to cooperate? Salome' needs a purpose then in the family.  Her purpose is to protect and mind the ministry and the house; full of children.  No matter what, the economy does not disclose a Swiss mind set on economics but some other kind of arguing, resistant diatribe.   


So, North America is some kind of "thorn in the side" of the global economy and we want to know who would tolerate it or why is it tolerated?    


Maybe you provide a property tax rebate for all home owners in those suburban centres  or a government rent rebate.  It is the concern of many that if the transgender groups are paid an income support but the non transgender are not paid, then this is gender inequality. But, it is also genocide. You deprive the male and female gender, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction. Gender inequality in any government policy is illegal and so is Gender genocide; that is gender genocide. Remember how you felt when you heard about female circumcision. It feels so heinous that you might have said also that it is gender genocide. But, is there a reason why gender genocide by virtue of material or financial starvation does not activate the shock at the inhumanity and the need for immediate redress?   The Ontario population should be celebrated asylum seekers and refugees to more humane economies and whisked away from this churlish economy.  Your asylum claim would have to go through. Warren is successful.    Isn't it a retrograde, genocide economy?  The income support policy promotes genocide against females and males.    


IHT


Advocating genocide

  •  (1) Every person who advocates or promotes genocide is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years.

  • Marginal note:Definition of genocide

    (2) In this section, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole or in part any identifiable group, namely,

    • (a) killing members of the group; or

    • (b) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction.

  • Marginal note:Consent

    (3) No proceeding for an offence under this section shall be instituted without the consent of the Attorney General.

  • Marginal note:Definition of identifiable group

    (4) In this section, identifiable group means any section of the public distinguished by colour, race, religion, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or mental or physical disability.

  • R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 318
  • 2004, c. 14, s. 1
  • 2014, c. 31, s. 12
  • 2017, c. 13, s. 3
  • 2019, c. 25, s. 120


See Egan and Nesbit v. Canada, 2 Thibaudeau v. Canada (M.N.R.), 3 and Miron v. Trudel.4. See also Fraser v Canada and Griggs v. Duke Power. Frazer and Griggs confirm that all discrimination in policy is illegal; not just in the employment context. 


See also the 14th amendment.  The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.[1][2][3]

A primary motivation for this clause was to validate the equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed that all citizens would have the guaranteed right to equal protection by law. As a whole, the Fourteenth Amendment marked a large shift in American constitutionalism, by applying substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War.

https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/pmb/eeo/directives/upload/Civil-Rights-Directive-2011-01CProcedures-11_5_2010-wk.pdf

The Equality Act 2010 safeguards against inequality in the UK and also Canada; not only in the employment context but in the provision of Government services.  The Act is directly applicable in Canada based on the BNA 1867.   

Equality Act 2010

Long titleAn Act to make provision to require Ministers of the Crown and others when making strategic decisions about the exercise of their functions to have regard to the desirability of reducing socio-economic inequalities; to reform and harmonise equality law and restate the greater part of the enactments relating to discrimination and harassment related to certain personal characteristics; to enable certain employers to be required to publish information about the differences in pay between male and female employees; to prohibit victimisation in certain circumstances; to require the exercise of certain functions to be with regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and other prohibited conduct; to enable duties to be imposed in relation to the exercise of public procurement functions; to increase equality of opportunity; to amend the law relating to rights and responsibilities in family relationships; and for connected purposes.
Citation2010 c 15
Introduced byHarriet Harman
Territorial extent England and Wales; Scotland; section 82, 105 (3) and (4) and 199 also apply to Northern Ireland

So, we are swimming in laws and codes that enshrine equality but we need the purposeful enforcement to achieve national goals.  Equality is the law and clean water, free of nuclear contaminants  is a legal requirement also.    If you saw brown water running out of your tap and the community centre taps,  how long would it take to solve the issue with the immediate cooperation of your neighbors?  It's just solved by dinner time as soon as you notice the problem. But, economically we have been going around in circles.     An income support for all citizens that is equal in benefit and amount is legal. An unequal income support is illegal. An income support for all citizens is where standard national and  global compliant Monetary policy begins since 1857. Maybe Lincoln observed this after his readings on Karl Marx.    There is some evident delay in the widespread uptake in the Western hemisphere with respect to this policy. We need to honor our own lives or else the other cultures will laugh at us. Now that you understand the strategic benefit of a national income support program to solve national issues with consumer stimulus and NAFTA population preservation, it should take hours to solve; as much time as it takes for Super Mario Brothers to fix a broken water main.   Join the Super Mario brothers in Vermont, Illinois and Massachusetts and in other states who receive this money automatically without any threshold or means test from 14 years old. It is just that the money is not provided in equal amounts and yet the cost of living in America is essentially the same with that Escalade or Ford Escape payment demanding an answer as soon as possible.    If Warren was in Massachusetts all these years since 14 years old, he would have attended an American Law School initially and then he would have been Mitch in the Firm with his Massachusetts income support and the owner of a Toyota Lexus and a used Benz Truck with 4 kids already at College by now.   

Usually, in North American history they called the aboriginal experience with formal legal processes colonialism and the fledgling nation's experience with Federalism in terms of the establishment of national legal processes and systems is a Civil War. So, would be at Civil War in North America over a national rail road? No; not a national rail road but maybe we are in some tussle with Federalism with respect to a national income support. Yet, we could allow for both a national system that guarantees a national minimum and the states and provinces can also establish their own maximum numbers. But, with Cosmopolitan in the air, we have been majoring in the minors and forgetting the major agenda. We need what is most important; money for families and not just condoms and half a viagra barbers for Saturday night. No; we need money for a family SUV and for Alusra(TM) Home Security so we know what is going on when we are not at home. I installed mine secretly and I know what you did not only last night but last summer. You did eat the last Oreo and you left the box in the cupboard. Alusra(TM) home security is not available really yet but its not like I am trying to ghetto take someone. I am trying to enjoy my North American experience.

Yet, evidently if GERONIMO is exemplary of  the average true North American Aboriginal in the Arctic and in the Everglades we notice that we don't see him very often. He is a third generation after the corn on the cob with a wax on it. The first aboriginal looked like an Australian bush man aboriginal. This might be due to new cosmetics and new cultural rebranding, identification and classifications, spinning the North American DNA all over the world to make GERONIMO North America Muslim North African, Surinamese Dutch and plain Latino or cool, cool, cool West Indian or French Samoan.   Comment Tu Fais? Mademoiselle, quelque chose bien tu regarder.    So, he is still around but evidently many from all back grounds and races   have died in the American genocide as instigated by retrograde  income support policy such that used to say when America sneezes, Canada catches a cold but it seems, the world catches a cold when the Canadian, Ontario citizen is not properly funded and maybe the Otario genocide has become a World War maybe twice now.   The lack of proper Income support funding in Otario has sacked global manufacturers such as Ford, FIAT and GM and has challenged others like a vortex of economic death.            


The cave man is fighting your LEVITICAL family structures.  He is fighting his own son.  She is fighting the phenomenon of her own husband. If you fight the Income Support, fight the money, then you fighting your own life, your own people and your own auto manufacturing job at the closing plants that do not see enough sales.  The income support, however,  reduces the amount of public disaffection on these issues.  You will also hear from the black people less frequently. They are good aboriginal people.   I thank God!  Yet too often they are put in situations,  contrary to laws to remind you about justice, peace, order, ownership and constitutionality when they may have been the first missionaries to North America as Euro moors and Berbers or Black tudors.    The Aboriginals were dark like Geronimo also.  GERONIMO LOOKS LIKE HE COULD BE THE FATHER OF Auntie  -or-a.  But, that says she could be my sister.    Columbus, Verrazano,  Cortes and Verrazano set up parishes, roads and other forms of property subdivision.    $65000.00 CAD/CBND(Canadian British National Dollars) is equal to £39000.00 real sterling pounds or $45000.00 EUD per year as support.  The English systems, relics for the relic hunters and institutions are less under threat, less unstable, less at risk of collapse.     


Noah and David are good biblical fathers for fathering. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.  Listen to the testimony of these men at night time in a Bible app. They went into their wives and conceived. It probably took as long as it takes as long as it takes a dog or a massive, huge mammal.    


What is your economy saying about improving the national GDP numbers in an automation economy and do you have a mechanism to pay every citizen an income support to stimulate the entire economy simultaneously to stave off fears of recessions, stimulate the GDP and make it less flaccid, less dysfunctional and more erect economically?  We erect new residential buildings every day but we fail to improve the income support policy so that people can pay the rent where the developer can earn the income to pay the loan on the project.  There is now an immediate condition apparently in Canada, Quebec not to be outside of Canada after arrest for any alleged criminal offense until the matters are resolved. The Quebecois can go to Iceland for the Aquarellum open public  (white, black, red and yellow) aboriginal residential school for French speaking fugitives. The real French are not sure why they were told to tolerate this with the Quebecois as it does threaten European security.  Yet, if they are in Europe to protest the failure in Canada to make the income support national and maintained nationally with regular inflationary increases, as covered with small increases in the sales tax at half a percent every 2 years but never more than 30%, we can hear what they have to say as it does affect national company revenues and national GDP when the income support is not consistent and paid to all citizens.  




Yet, you see the Toussaint Schism and the moves or plot and you want us to be excited that we are seeing him do it but why would I be excited and we have already done this before and everybody is dead...and then what we did..and then what we do.....!?!    An income support of  $120,000.00 per year is economically necessary and this is the motivation; economic necessity! We could discuss the humanity issue but we are moved by the economic logic since to a cave man, what is human is still debatable to some rather well dressed cave men who seem to think they are looking fine in that fur lined business suit.  We will discuss the economics shortly. 


Comments