There was a 1977 special consumer report from Toyota that confirmed vehicle efficiency was the most important aspect to the consumer buyer when purchasing a vehicle. This is true and has borne itself out time and time again as efficiency in fuel and cost of maintenance is more important to the buyer then Corinthian leather. What is that any way? Toyota may have received a leaked copy of this report and followed it; verbatim. They now have the command of at least 9% of the European car buying market with their commitment to Efficiency as seen in the regenerative hybrid in the last major move toward internal combustion engine efficiency and they also made a global foot hold in the late '70s with their more efficient four cylinder models for the American car buyer although they used cheap paint and metal initially that tended to rust more easily than the average American model and this kept car buyers hesitant although they like the idea of a Celica or Crown or a Toyota Pick up truck ; very popular indeed. It's evident that almost every Ford pick up is really a Toyota these days any way. If its about regenerative zero refueling technology, then VOLKSWAGEN is the leader right now with the ID series of vehicles but they may still be behind its competitors with market share as maybe refueling in a regenerative hybrid or a gasoline vehicle for many humans is still very much the bad habit; like smoking. Volkswagen had foreign car producer pole position in North America in 1953 as seen in the Walt Disney movie Herbie the Love Bug and confirmed their participation in the North American market. They slowly but surely lost pole position as they sold a Bug and a Van to cow hands on the way to the stampede and to the average American who needed more space for a side of beef or many suit cases on the way to Los Angeles from Oklahoma. They needed a cheap pick up maybe and something that might fit a small couch. The bug was not designed for this and many VW products did not give the people what they needed culturally in America although they were still quite popular and profitable. They have not gone out of business while the American manufacturers have all been taken over by wholly owned Japanese or partially Asian conglomerate arrangements with some European ownership. Jeep and Chrysler is an example. GM and Ford are examples. The income support did not become available for every American for the entirety of the WW2 post war generation. There may have been a total income support available for about 9 years after WW2 and then Eisenhower shut it down to talk about a military industrial complex where I suppose he thought the Americans would get a job from military contracts to build more munitions, armaments and airplanes but machines have taken over more than 70% of industrial jobs so in spite of the government contracts, there is no job for the American necessarily and hence an income support in keeping with European economic expectations to ensure sufficient demand for the abundant robotic supply is what is absolutely necessary for the economy no matter who or what is ordering the machinery. Toyota And Giving People What They Want Toyota arrived in the late 70's and added to the market maybe something more that people wanted like a smallish midsized vehicle, a selection of cheap pick ups and other super cheap compacts; what the people wanted with many features not available in the VW. So, we learn something. It was a missed European opportunity. //// This missed opportunity happens again after Gulf War 1 when Toyota got into the luxury market with a cheap luxury vehicle. Volkswagen had merged with Audi years before and with Porsche but the Audi was never cheap luxury; nor is Porsche. It happens again after Gulf War 2 when Toyota got into the hybrid offerings; another missed opportunity when the VW did not seize on its German cultural affinity across the economy (Budweiser, Levis, Oscar Meyer, Bayer) with the Americans, provide the Americans and Canadians with a national income support or lobby for this market maker and then also adapt its product offerings to keep up with competition. Click here.

   

There was a 1977 special consumer report from Toyota that confirmed vehicle efficiency was the most important aspect to the consumer buyer when purchasing a vehicle.  This is true and has borne itself out time and time again as efficiency in fuel and cost of maintenance is more important to the buyer then Corinthian leather.  What is that any way?  Toyota may have received a leaked copy of this report and followed it; verbatim.   They now have the command of at least 9% of the European car buying market with their commitment to Efficiency as seen in the regenerative hybrid in the last major move toward internal combustion engine efficiency and they also made a global foot hold in the late '70s with their more efficient four cylinder models for the American car buyer although they used cheap paint and metal initially that tended to rust more easily than the average American model and this kept car buyers hesitant although they like the idea of a Celica or Crown or a Toyota Pick up truck ; very popular indeed. It's evident that almost every Ford pick up is really a Toyota these days any way.  If its about regenerative zero refueling technology, then VOLKSWAGEN is the leader right now with the ID series of vehicles but they may still be behind its competitors with market share as maybe refueling in a regenerative hybrid or a gasoline vehicle for many humans is still very much the bad habit; like smoking.   Volkswagen had foreign car producer pole position in North America in 1953  as seen in the Walt Disney movie Herbie the Love Bug and confirmed their participation in the North American market.  They slowly but surely lost pole position as they sold a Bug and a Van to cow hands on the 

way to the stampede and  to the average American who needed more space for a side of beef or many suit cases on the way to Los Angeles from Oklahoma.  They needed a cheap pick up maybe and something that might fit a small couch.  The bug was not designed for this and many VW products did not give the people what they needed culturally in America although they were still quite popular and profitable.  They have not gone out of business while the American manufacturers have all  been taken over by wholly owned Japanese or partially Asian conglomerate arrangements with some European ownership. Jeep and Chrysler is an example.  GM and Ford are examples.    The income support did not become available for every American for the entirety of the WW2 post war generation.  There may have been a total income support available for about 9 years after WW2 and then Eisenhower shut it down to talk about a military industrial complex where I suppose he thought the Americans would get  a job from military contracts to build more munitions, armaments  and airplanes but machines have taken over more than 70% of industrial jobs so in spite of the government contracts, there is no job for the American necessarily and hence an income support in keeping with European economic expectations to ensure sufficient demand for the abundant robotic supply is what is absolutely necessary for the economy no matter who or what is ordering the machinery.     

Toyota And Giving People What They Want

Toyota arrived in the late 70's and added to the market maybe something more that people wanted like a smallish midsized vehicle, a selection of cheap pick ups and other super cheap compacts; what the people wanted with many features not available in the VW.  So, we learn something.  It was a missed European opportunity.    

////

This missed opportunity happens again after Gulf War 1 when Toyota got into the luxury market with a cheap luxury vehicle.  Volkswagen had merged with Audi years before and with Porsche but the Audi was never cheap luxury; nor is Porsche.   It happens again after Gulf War 2 when Toyota got into the hybrid offerings;  another missed opportunity when the VW did not seize on its German cultural affinity across the economy (Budweiser, Levis, Oscar Meyer, Bayer) with the Americans, provide the Americans and Canadians with a national income support or lobby for this market maker and then also adapt its product offerings to keep up with competition.        

////

The day is now upon us that even regular large ocean going vessels are now all powered by fuel cells with electric generators since oil and diesel for propulsion is just pointless next to the clean certainty of electric generators and motors as powered by fuel cells.  The average US NAVY Aircraft carrier is powered by 400 years of old and new propulsion technology that is not in sink with the word "efficiency".  It is powered by nuclear reactors that boil water to create steam to power a generator that makes electricity to power an electric motor.  Our idea is to take the ocean water and extract "hydrogen" from it maybe by turning it into a gas or steam that will be piped as a gas  into the fuel cell to power a fuel cell that will then power the electric propellor with the electric motor built in.  The only war we face is on ignorance and on inefficiency in preserving our lives when the real war is a war of economic attrition.  The nuclear ship is poison to our oceans as it may belch out nuclear water in its operation as a by product of its operation, killing wild life.   Ocean water quality cannot wait.

 It's just that Toyota and others saw very early in the late '90s that any step forward in regenerative vehicle technology that saves customers money while not upsetting the refueling habits was essential to moves forward in vehicle mobility in the same way the fuel injector was essential in the 1930's; yet  the Americans resisted. They resisted right through to the early part of this current century while marketing the smaller carbureted Detroit engines as fuel injected and this was false advertising and an easy class action law suit.   They Americans tend to resist as late arriving Aboriginals( arriving late to the existing known world of established concepts and technological conventions.   The injector saved fuel and also was  more reliable than the carburetors on road inclines where carburetors tended to shut off.  The real answer about technology that saves fuel  or that is less pollutive is that it has to be used immediately once it is safe for regular market use.  There Could be competing steps forward and  this may be the first time in history that there are so many  different options in terms of  vehicle power plant.      We may have to  adjust quickly our habits as consumers and move forward.   As such, a vehicle that is as fuel efficient as the operation as a "wind up" toy is ideal and then maybe we let go of the dual economy in Vehicle culture that involves Vehicle and fuel.  Instead,  we will get a vehicle and  the gas stations will sell food, candy  and water.  They make more money on food, coffee and water now anyway since the cost of producing liquid fuel outweighs the profit earned.   It looks like Volkswagen has hit the chord for the ubiquitous and is the leader one more time in vehicle design.      The Mirai looks genius in silver.  Warren 's next vehicle will be a Toyota hybrid.  VOLKSWAGEN IS NOT MAKING ENOUGH HYBRID OR  Pollution FREE VEHICLES.  THE Volkswagen ID series is totally Regenerative but people don't seem to know this.  It may carry the lowest environmental foot print in the market; the Volkswagen ID 3,4 and 5.   The electric hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle is certainly with us and here to stay.  It is the smarter electric vehicle with recharging or refueling that takes seconds. It has a smaller environmental footprint than the plugin rechargeable vehicles with those tremendous,  big cadmium batteries. It is rumored that a Tesla type model will be coming soon.    The question is not whether either vehicle or design type  is electric.  They are both essentially electric but the fuel cell is more convenient for the customer and carries a near zero environmental foot print as the only exhaust is cool  water vapor.   The materials are recyclable.