By FSJ 16/09/2025. The Housing and the Affordability issue: The architect said lets reason together as we build and design an energetic future with financially energized people; a discussion. By Mary Godwhen. Click here. BW Where would it go if I reverse engineer a "BAPE" shoe logo? It says, "whatever it is, it has to be...the bastard of Babylon, so let me use your essays in an attempt to use you." The irony of this is that you want the current king or his friends at Citroen maybe to pay for what you have done, for what you have just refused to doz following your imagination about some king in some other era. You have had the power and authority but you have not taken all opportunity to help your surrogate family, the population as you instead express your imagination. Do you remember the ballerina that stole the wood blocks from the other ballerinas' shoes, hoping to be the only one on stage; and then she got shot by the show director on the day of the performance? Was that your..... relative? Charles cares. He has vowed to have the most able and responsive Tiger economy in Europe and North America and the most safe and ably funded citizens in those regions; his citizens, his people. It is that we will be the economic winners; not losers; at the top and not the bottom...in front and not at the back. We might have been founded by the governing Roman and African civilization 350 years after France but our current economy set to become a Tiger economy runs from Dover to Vancouver. We have all the same technology as Europe and Russia at our disposal so there is no reason for this silly, ongoing dalience; economically speaking that is causing a population hemorrhage within our territory but no more. If we are good to ourselves at least, if not white, then what should we do? We have to win. We can't stand a derailed subway everyday and if it happened, we would find a new subway operator; nor can we stand a underfunded and derailed economy. Government finance builds the projects and government finance enables buyers and renters with income support to occupy the projects or is there someone imagining that she will have all the empty units as financed by the government to herself while the Canadian people that the homes were built for are encamped outside? We could help them with emergency benefits cards ( available to all Canadians for about 4 years) that can be used to pay for the housing and we will also send direct income support payments to all Canadians to be received at their bank account as registered with the government. It might be that all the new buildings and development are covered by government finances. This is good for the developers but it does not mean we can tolerate foreigners occupants only with their benefit money over and above what is received in benefits by the average North American. That is economic losing; as we cannot afford to occupy the space and place intended for us. Charles says we must pay the benefits now in full and sufficient requisite amounts to support our population, our team. It's a good thing for the developers and builders also. Let's look at even a basic rent of $1000.00 per month with a new base of tenants for the one bedroom units across Ontario; 100 new tenants or so. They will be told politely in that new condo in Barrie or Waterloo that they have to wear H & M, Uni Qlo or Old Navy and to kit it out following examples in the magazine. This might be a "Housing" rent at $1000.00 per month per building with a 100 new tenants once you turn the cash on and so that is an extra $100,000.00 per month. What would I demand from us if I am really Portuguese or Italian? If you are an alleged business leader and accomplished business man how would you lead the economy to solve this issue of the "running down" economy if the matter dropped on your lap? How long would it take? You think the Europeans and Russians have not noticed your slow inability to solve the problems to make your economy really move. But, maybe you would run for Office to be a national leader if luck would cover your way; twice maybe and you would solve the economy previously run by who and to what end, solving it in a New York minute and then they would mint a coin in your honour? You would "Dunk" on this economy issue and show them how Marilyn Mommy calls you on your telephone; sing it!! Otherwise, we get it. You chose yourself to be the President and you chose a Defence Secretary who parallels your lack of knowledge concerning anything except hair gel and whiskey. You don't anyone to show you up. But, you could at least care to defend the population and ensure "our team" has the essentials. It would only take him a day to get it going. We can design anything. Certainly, anything we design demands and requires people with money for us to enjoy it; if it's a restaurant, an amusement park, a shopping centre or a town or city in general. The Bugatti sellers will have more sales and the Vauxhall owners will finally make full payment for the shopping and vacations; full payment for their vehicles also. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might. Money is important. It has to be important. So, why are we incessantly brought to have this conversation about income support rather quite often when observing the economies west of Calais as run by; whom? When it comes to the economy and the people suffering in moneylessness after automation, you seem to think you are teaching Europe about your imaginary King in French history; that you think the king or queen would do nothing. This is your idea or theory. Maynard Keynes who was more...Swiss gave your attitude a name. He called it Laissez Faire. Laissez Faire is not an economic policy but the policy of no policy in light of industrial mechanization of labor and the social problems it occasions when the families do not have enough money to buy their coal for heat, milk, bananas and vegetables. They would usually just take what they need; wherever they can take it. The economy is run by whom? The income support in Vermont, Minnesota and Massachusetts exceeds $70000.00 per year. This should be so for the whole, entire continent. But, some states and provinces, not all, are being run by income support benefit men touring boxes of undistributed emergency debit cards that they can now hand out to people in those camps. They seek public attention more than public efficacy. They have had enough time to solve the obvious. Money is the obvious issue but you wouldn't be waiting for an God fearing man to come and campaign on this issue when we know you can see the problem and solve it for us in the same way you can solve bad whiskey with militarism. You can also solve bad uneven roads and bad uneven distribution of income support benefits from state to state. All states' citizens should receive at least $100,000.00 per year as income support. In the SNAP Act, it states that all citizens should receive no less than $100,000.00 per e as income support. We do not enjoy suffering, lack or insufficiency. But maybe a vengeful bum might.